71

The donated handmade wooden benches are not ADA compliant so the city is forcing the builder to remove them. So having literally nothing is the alternative. Also the city says the builder can put the benches in their parks, but wouldn’t that also need to be ADA compliant?

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 13 hours ago

What does this have to do with cars?

[-] Zodarr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Promoting the use of public transport

[-] jaredwhite@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

Portland, Maine…just in case it's not clear. (Wasn't to me until I poked around the website a bit.)

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 14 points 18 hours ago

I mean, they couldn't build an ADA bench next to it? Seems like one of those cases a grandfather clause is useful. New York doesn't rip out it's history overnight, it adds to things to make them compliant while preserving the unique culture

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 9 points 16 hours ago

Accessibility is important. Couldn't they modify them to meet accessibility standards?

[-] thenextguy@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Why do dentists care about bus benches?

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 18 hours ago

Americans with Disabilities Act.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I think it is more about hating the poors.

What I get from the article is that the city could poor some concrete and make them compliant but is choosing to go with nothing instead.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago

For one thing, all benches must have a 5-by-8-foot concrete pad to be ADA compliant.

Is this a Portland thing? In LA I see a lot of concrete benches, but I also see a lot of metal ones and in NYC I would see (possibly grandfathered in) wooden ones.

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 14 points 18 hours ago

Pad, as in underneath the bench.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 18 hours ago

Ohh I see, for stability purposes that makes a bit more sense. But it can’t possibly be that expensive to have the city just pour concrete in those spots, or to let volunteers do it.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 16 hours ago

That's way bigger than the footprint. Usually you have big level concrete areas around doors for wheelchairs, for example.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

Even if it’s 3x the size of the bench, it’s concrete, not a multimillion dollar building, and the community clearly wants benches. If the wooden ones are legitimately unfit for the public then they should install proper benches. But just pouring concrete would probably be cheaper.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

The compliance rule is a stability thing underneath the bench, so that people in wheelchairs and other mobility devices can maneuver around them. Not that the bench itself needs to be concrete.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 4 points 16 hours ago

I think that's correct, but I'm failing to see the need for a person sitting in a wheelchair to be able to approach a bench on a pad.

Are they expecting people sitting in a wheelchair to be able to transition to sitting on the bench for some reason?

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

There are tons of other mobility issues people have short of wheelchairs like mobility scooters, crutches, those scooter like things for leg injuries. Or they might just like to park next to the bench and hang out with someone they know, like a regilar person.

But mostly because when the bench is mounted to the concrete it gives the bench a solid base so that if someone is off balance and leans really hard against the bench, it won't topple over. Think elderly people, or people with balance issues.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
71 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9705 readers
112 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS