491
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago

And I refuse to get in a ring with Tyson...so, I can relate to his completely rational fear.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

Just dodge when his outline flashes. After 90 seconds he starts throwing more normal punches and you can start doing some damage.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 61 points 18 hours ago

He runs from a FOX hosted debate? He must be scared shitless of that woman!

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 15 hours ago

For serious. That's his cheer squad, guaranteed to try to help him. I thought she'd reject and he'd make a big deal out of it for the rest of the campaign. What a coward. Oh, Donnie. You shitbag.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I thought she’d reject and he’d make a big deal out of it for the rest of the campaign.

That was exactly what I was expecting, too. But hey, Donny saved us ;-)

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

He did so poorly during the last one that his handlers are sure to keep him away from that debate stage at any cost, especially when it's so close to the election. They can't afford to have him say more dumb shit because they don't have gaffe-prone Joe Biden to grab soundbytes to play on repeat and the news will just report on Trump's nonsense.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

He's making up so much ground, he does so much better when he stfu or just says the things people expect him to say.

The more time he spends away from national cameras the better, that debate was brutal for him, it made even his followers have some doubts.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Well, it did reveal what kind of idiot he is, so this debate was extremely useful for the voters.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 17 hours ago

Chickens naturally run from the fox

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 25 points 15 hours ago

The election is going to be tight. Right now, Harris leads very, very slightly, by about three points. FiveThirtyEight placed the odds at about 53-47 as of yesterday (and they're historically pretty good). Trump got his ass handed to him at the last debate, and he knows it. Unless he was able to git gud really fast, a 2nd debate would not improve his chances. Yes, he looks weak by not taking it on Fox of all places, but that's better than taking it an doing just as badly a 2nd time. There's almost no upside to him accepting an invitation to a debate.

But.

Trump is also incredibly egotistical. He wants to be on stage, and he thinks that he's good at debating. He wants to be seen; he needs to be seen. Turning down free publicity to present himself first--and his policies a distant second--on a national television program witnessed by millions of people, that's gotta hurt him.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 22 hours ago
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 59 points 1 day ago
[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 27 points 1 day ago

Don't Trump

Open Inside

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

What a cuck.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 95 points 1 day ago

Did fox just offer him the friendliest possible venue for a massive media event, days before the election, and he turned it down?

I presumed the plan was to either let the harris campaign say no to fox so trump could call her a coward, or get a friendly venue to hammer whatever comey-esque hillary's emails nonsense russia cooks up this time.

Does trump turning this down seem like yet another own goal to anyone else? Or have I been underestimating how much the debate hurt him?

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 55 points 1 day ago

You may be underestimating the depth of the narcissistic wound Kamala dealt him at the debate.

I posted this last month:.

Calling it now:  

Since there’s not enough time left for him to recover from this brutal ego bruise, I predict he’ll only do rallies from now on, or appearances on far-right media, because he’ll retreat to his snowglobe for reassurance for a while. He’ll avoid addressing Kamala directly, but he’ll ramp up his own network and rile up his mob. His team will struggle to rein him in, and some appearances might be cancelled.

He’s been more restrained at his rallies than I expected (he’s unhinged, sure, but only mildly more so). It may take him years – if at all – to recover from being so thoroughly bodied by a minority woman.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

I’m not saying anyone should care about him but I imagine two assassination attempts fucked with him too. He just announced rallies at Madison Square Garden and Coachella when he should be in swing states. People are trying to create rational reasons for it — like winning the House so he can steal the election — but I think he’s shook.

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago

He's picking venues that will let him get away with not paying them. He has a history of doing that, and many venues are telling his campaign no unless they pay upfront. Which is not a phrase he's ever been familiar with.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

but I think he’s shook.

Eh, I disagree. He lacks the self-introspection to be unnerved. After all, he did go back to Butler PA.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 9 points 22 hours ago

I believe it. The stories about him being deeply affected seemed plausible.

I suspect that the psychological effects of being nearly killed would operate below the level of self-introspection. Like trauma just happens and changes your behavior, whether you're very self aware or a senile narcissist.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

His cognitive decline might be accelerating too fast.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 102 points 1 day ago
[-] paf0@lemmy.world 118 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Harris could beat him on Fox, OAN, NewsMax or RT. She could do it anywhere and he knows it. He is a coward. If he had any backbone he would suggest another network.

[-] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 91 points 1 day ago

Could she beat him in a box? Would she beat him with a fox? Could she beat him here or there? She would beat him anywhere!

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

She could beat him the air,
She could beat him just on hair!
She could beat him day and night,
It wouldn’t even be a fight!

She’ll also catch him on the lam,
And we’ll eat green eggs and ham!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the arena of the screen so bright,

Harris stands ready,

a formidable sight.

On Fox or OAN,

she’s sure to prevail,

NewsMax and RT,

she’ll tip the scale.

He trembles in shadows,

a coward at heart,

Knowing her strength sets him worlds apart.

If courage were his,

he'd seek a new stage,

But silence remains,

locked in his cage.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago

I think he's just trying to coast on whatever popularity he has without fucking anything up. If anything this is probably the best call he could make. Which is why it's probably someone close to him telling him not to do anything stupid. Because, let's be honest, he's so dumb he'd go for it in a heartbeat.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 23 points 23 hours ago

No doubt his counselors are telling him to STFU, ride it out.

And fuck all y'all (not you OP!) saying he's always been this stupid. Been watching the man, more closely than I wanted to, over the last 6-years. His mind is circling the drain so fast even I'm stunned.

[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"THERE WILL BE NO REMATCH," Trump said on his Truth Social platform. "SO THERE IS NOTHING TO DEBATE."

Trotting out the classics, huh? Big "If we did less testing, we'd have less COVID cases" energy.

Trump said it was very late in the process now to have a debate.

The second Presidential Debate in 2020 took place on Oct. 22nd. This invitation from Fox News is for Oct. 24th or 27th. And the original CNN debate was scheduled for Oct. 23rd so fuck right off with that excuse, coward.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Drusas@fedia.io 42 points 1 day ago

lol, what a coward. Won't even do a debate on a platform that goes all out to suck his dick.

[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago
[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
491 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19016 readers
3622 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS