695
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 116 points 2 months ago
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 2 months ago

Kinda fucked for the people that didnt sow, but yeah, the ones that did shall enjoy the reaping.

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 2 months ago

The people who actually sowed this are only going to reap a few extra weeks of complaining, "the poors are making the streets so ugly, why won't the police arrest them faster?"

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Especially true for those rightwing religious nuts. Their book tells them Hosea 8:7: "For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 96 points 2 months ago

Maybe running a political party off of hate wasn't such a good idea.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 52 points 2 months ago

Not to ever be a Florida apologist in my entire life, but hating homeless people crosses party lines.

https://apnews.com/article/california-newsom-homeless-los-angeles-san-francisco-5b2b3aca9ca56efb444a717d278c1fd9

California dems jumped at taking away homeless camps. Not helping them, just destroying the camps. Claim victory, homeless move a few blocks over, or the next town over, without their stuff. It's like a South Park episode.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago
[-] Mac@mander.xyz 8 points 2 months ago

It's only a bad idea if you give a shit about the populace.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 68 points 2 months ago

Man who tf goes around enforcing these laws after a disaster. Imagine some wack ass old white guy ticketing people outside of the FEMA medical station for loitering.

[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 46 points 2 months ago

I can see you haven't interacted with many police in these areas. I wouldn't be surprised in the least by any of that behavior. The cops only protect and serve property, not people.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I never once expressed disbelief.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Margaret Killjoy did a 2 part podcast about relief efforts in Asheville, and she mentioned that one FEMA worker she spoke to told her one of the biggest hurdles to actually getting people help was the fact that a lot of local rescue and aid efforts are first and foremost run by police and the military (and other local first responders, but in the US police generally outnumber these by a hideous ratio).

The worker mentioned that the frustrations mostly come because community and mutual aid are inherently horizontal - you tell me you need food, I have food, I share food, no strings. Police and military are taught to desire hierarchy and structure and order, they want "these people need aid first and then these people and then these" rather than "EVERYONE needs aid, and if we offer it freely people generally won't take advantage", which is usually the case actually. I can definitely see police going "well I know all these people just don't have homes anymore, but if we stop enforcing this law society will break down entirely".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 months ago

Nah, it’ll be some 28 year old wannabe Punisher wearing Oakleys whose weekend activities include watching football and abusing his girlfriend.

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 64 points 2 months ago

This is why we need to ban hurricanes.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 17 points 2 months ago

Nah, we gotta nuke the hurricanes.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

It's a win-win. We destroy the hurricanes, and we also reduce our nuclear stockpile. I can see no flaws in this proposal. Checkmate, peaceniks!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 61 points 2 months ago

Politicians make laws on the basis of "I'll never be in that situation". But then a son or daughter comes out as LGBTQ+ and all of a sudden laws need to change. A daughter has been raped and all of a sudden laws need to change. They don't make laws to help us. They make laws to control us and sweep away things they don't like.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

A daughter has been raped and all of a sudden laws need to change.

Nah, they can afford to fly their daughters out.

[-] Naz@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

There's a shocking number of people who walk this Earth without a functional world model or empathy, and don't feel things until they occur to them personally.

It's almost akin to a sort of brain damage or disorder, I'm not qualified enough to be able to explain what occurs in the brain structurally for this to happen; only that when they're grimacing for getting convicted after they've murdered 40 people (or millions, if it's an oil exec, for example) and wondering why that's happening, you carefully and patiently explain to them that's only part of what they've inflicted upon others and society writ large.

It doesn't create a "just" or even sane society philosophically speaking, and the legislative process has been almost completely subverted by that segment of the population as you'd pointed out, specifically to be dysfunctional.

Maybe we ought to install more mirrors in the legislative branches

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] obre@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

If you feel the urge to argue for collective punishment just shut the fuck up. Saying 'you reap what you sow' in this case is regressive and cruel. Fascists enacted this law undemocratically and many people, human beings that you should have empathy for, are effectively held captive by the GOP which has heavily gerrymandered Florida and engaged in voter suppression and disenfranchisement. Think critically for a second and direct your criticism at the right people.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Literally the post above this one in my feed.

This is exactly the problem with running on "fuck you, got mine". Side A bans homelessness. Side A ends up homeless somehow. Side B, because they aren't running on hate, has sympathy for the circumstances Side A (and B) have found themselves in and helps. Side A faces no consequences ever (hyperbole). Side A doubles down on banning homelessness.

I'm not trying to argue against what you're saying but fuck does this system suck.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Nope. Just nope. You don't get the "fascists did it" thing when urban camping bans are being passed all over the country in red and blue cities, counties, and states.

Homelessness isn't a conservative wedge issue. It's the one class both parties have deemed it okay to abuse and systemically imprison or kill. And now that we have two large examples of people being made homeless through no fault of their own, you want to disavow it and say it's just the far right?

Fuck no. You take that shame and you sit in it and next time you make it an issue to not support council members, mayors, and state officials who support criminalizing the homeless.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Empathy is for individuals. If someone came to me, maga hat, and truck covered in trump Humber stickers, and said him and his daughter had been displaced by the hurricane and needed help, I would give them a room, food and whatever else I could to help and ask for nothing in return. He has not hurt me (directly) and I have no bad blood with him personally so long as he's not being outright racist or anything around me.

But when we're talking about MAGA as a general group, they have hurt me, they are racist and homophobic and trnasphobic and misogynistic and I will happily revel in the Schadenfreude.

[-] CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

If see a nazi sitting at a table and 10 people are at the table talking to them, you have a table with 11 nazis.

There is no tolerance for intolerance.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] femtech@midwest.social 7 points 2 months ago

Naw, I wouldn't trust a trumper to be in my house or around me. But I'm a queer so I get more vitriol from Republicans.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Yup. I will, however, feel less empathy for the people who did vote for these policies

[-] bcgm3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

If you feel the urge to argue for collective punishment just shut the fuck up.

I started writing up this lengthy comment about how this article isn't even about people displaced by the storms so much as those who were already homeless before, and how only ~39% of Florida voters are registered Republican, and even then we're talking about whole families and single mothers here, and about government corruption and voter disenfranchisement, but... You said it all, and much more succinctly. Thank you!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ulkesh@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

That’s a shame. Thoughts and prayers.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago

While the law includes exceptions during emergencies like major storms, those protections end when the hurricane order is no longer in place.

The article never explains the title.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean, I think it does. A hurricane order expires shortly after the storm is over. It can take months for new shelter to be provided for those that lose their homes. Some people might prefer just to live out of their RV or a tent or whatever to save money while new living arrangements are figured out.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ya because people can just pick up the shattered pieces of their lives on the governments timeline. They'll remove the hurricane order way too soon resulting in additional people being imprisoned or removed from their "homes" and their land will be sold off to a golf course or oil company.

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 36 points 2 months ago

You know what this reminds me of? There was some cheap ass webcomic in the very early 2000s that had an Amish protagonist. I only remember a single comic where the main character is watching TV and has some pundit say that poor and homeless should be shot. Then our Amish hero sets the pundit's house on fire rendering him homeless.

The pundit declares himself poor without his house and is promptly shot by his own followers because they made good his beliefs on shooting the poor and homeless. It was actually kinda funny.

But that being said, it amazes me just how often people forget the lessons of the past. The great depression seriously changed America's views on poverty being an entirely individual failing for many, many decades. Even into the Nixon administration he had to remind everyone that he was a New Dealer and wasn't going to roll back any of that shit. They had to wait until baby boomers, who did not grow up in the depression and were the ungrateful beneficiaries of the numerous programs in its wake, were the main voting block before beginning to roll that shit back.

It's also kinda incredible just how the libertarian and conservative propaganda apparatus really nullified most criticism of this shit. While that was always case even back in the 1930s, it was never to this extent.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Remains me of when Spawn put the Leader of the KKK in Black face and they lynched him.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] fishos@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

Sounds like a lot of people in Florida are about to become homeless too.... I dunno, I say they completely, 100% enforce the laws right now. You didn't fight against this bullshit because it "doesn't affect me"? Well now it can affect you. Ticket everyone. Waste everyone's time. It was so important to do this, then fucking do it. Be the fucking clowns you are. Ticket people who lost their home, who are camping in their front yard. What, they're having a bad time right now and we should be generous? That's homeless people all the time.

Suspending the law because it's a weather emergency is bullshit. It's being suspended because it might affect voters. Just trying to cover their own ass when they need it and shafting anyone else when it's convenient.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

ITT a whole lot of people talking shit while their local governments are doing the exact same thing. This is a map from 2015. It's only gotten worse since then.

If what's happening in Florida disgusts you then check your own laws first.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

It’s not a political thing, it’s an urban vs. rural thing. Cities tend to have more robust services for the homeless, so naturally homeless people wind up gravitating there.

They’ll find a way to suspend the law so it doesn’t affect victims of the hurricanes and then reinstitute them again later.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

"Banned sitting in public"??

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I didn't see that one but I wouldn't be surprised. They keep coming up with inane stuff that only applies to those people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] frezik@midwest.social 32 points 2 months ago

Under the new Florida law, any citizen or business can sue beginning in January if they feel the anti-camping ban is not being properly enforced.

This is pants on head stupid. We could probably count on actual police and DAs understanding the situation and not enforcing this law in extraordinary circumstances. We can't count on every HOA board member doing the same. Even if a judge grants an immediate motion to dismiss, it's still a complete waste of everyone's time and money. That's the best case scenario.

[-] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago
[-] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 2 months ago

Well that's a problem somebody could've seen coming, and probably did, and were probably told to shut the hell up.

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

God works in mysterious ways.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Sure it's Floriduh, but suspend the law for a year already.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
695 points (99.3% liked)

News

23669 readers
4002 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS