390
Because I'm lazy (sh.itjust.works)
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] istdaslol@feddit.org 4 points 15 hours ago

It’s depending on a package that’s now unsupported and not in the official repo

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 29 points 1 day ago

There’s no such thing as a hard-coded script if you have write access.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

It's parameterized in detail

[-] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago

I remember searching stack overflow for a oddly specific issue and found a post about it with an answer. The person who asked the question was me 6 years ago.

I had the same experience, however, I was the one who answered it. Completely forgot about it until then as well

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

The person who asked the question was me 6 years ago.

I have a numbered account on S-O because I couldn't be arsed to make an account. Almost every month I'll try to upvote a response and find out it's my own. I don't remember writing the response and I only vaguely remember seeing the issue it's solving.

I'm convinced future-me is going back in time and writing these but - so far - I never come to my own dinner invite for myself; and knowing I don't, I know I shouldn't.

[-] Steak@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

You're way ahead of yourself that guy doesn't stand a chance.

That’s why I always answer my own questions on stackoverflow, if I find the answer first.

[-] db2@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

I saw something a while back an about posting the wrong answer intentionally so a certain subset would not be able to resist providing a "correction".

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Some call this Cunningham's Law. It is remarkable how people will ignore a question, but trip over themselves to correct someone. Pedants are going to be pedantic (but may have a useful answer occasionally).

The developers where I work sometimes use this trick on our users. When they can't get a response from the users on a request for design input or feedback on something (which happens a lot) the devs will sometimes release some piece of garbage looking thing, and then the users will very quickly put in support cases with the requested info telling them the missing stuff, etc.

Human nature is why we can't have nice things.

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

60% of the time it works every time

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I find the answer first.

At least some pedant like me won't need to come along after and fix the writing; so thanks !

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Better than spending a day writing the script, only to discover that you'd already written a better one as soon as you're done.

First day at Antimemetics and I'm already wasting my own time.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

That's almost as bad as spending time upgrading a script only to find out you already updated it and forgot you gave it a stupid name.

Thank the gods for content searching vs file name searching. Only way I can find stuff some day.

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Spend 5x as long as the original task generalizing it,and it doesn't work 🙃

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

function x is now deprecated.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
390 points (98.5% liked)

memes

9916 readers
1978 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS