616
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

I mean yeah but didn’t Walz personally send the national guard against citizens during protests? Maybe let someone else field this one.

[-] DrMorose@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

Being a vet myself I would HOPE that most commanders especially the Joint Chiefs would say no to that level of absurdity and bullshit. If it came down to it yes he could relieve commanders till he found someone to follow his orders, but if that happened I would almost assume a coup would take place because the CIC is trying to subvert the Constitution and every Service Member is charged with upholding said document.

Now getting a 3 letter agency to do it...is another matter entirely, but again any federal employee is sworn to uphold the Constitution and not the man. I just feel those 3 letters can be swayed a little bit easier.

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

The problem is, most people don’t think he’ll actually do it- because they have the attention span of goldfish.

The rest of us know full-well to assume he is dead serious.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

People forget that under Trump, he sent in unmarked federal officers who took protesters from the street without any named justification against state and local officals wishes

Last week [July, 2020], federal officers started cracking down on crowds gathering in the city against the wishes of state and local officials, drawing widespread criticism and legal challenges.

Federal officers in unmarked vehicles appeared to forcefully seize protesters from the streets and detain them without justification. They have also fired tear gas and less-lethal munitions into crowds of demonstrators.

[...]

The role of federal troops sent to Portland is the subject of intense speculation at the moment. Numerous widely-shared videos show troops in camouflaged combat-style uniform arresting protesters, transporting them away in apparently unmarked vehicles.

[...]

They belong to a new federal force created last month in an executive order signed by President Trump which tasks them to protect historic monuments, memorials, statues, and federal facilities.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53473732

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

He also had a goon squad execute a guy in the pcnw because the dude had shot a proud boy and then Trump later bragged about it.

[-] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

I do feel surprised that Trump's comments on using the military against Americans isn't all over the news.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

the news is like 80% run by billionaires who want to pay less taxes. They didn't even drill him on any of the insane shit he's said when the last debate came up.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago

It's Trump's schtick. He spews out a constant stream of nonsense. His supporters are conditioned to ignore it.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

It's like a sewer backing up; you can't count the turds as fast as they fly out. For every one they scoop out they've got five more passing by unseen.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Because he says so much bat shit crazy things that none of them stick and the outrage just goes from 1 thing to another

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago

I like his line "If he was your Grandpa, you'd take away his keys"

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But what about the economy

that trump left Biden

. What about MEEEEEEEEE.

  • 49% of the country literally right now.
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Say this literally every time you have a chance, the data overwhelmingly show that Republicans are bad for the economy

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2024/03/01/democratic-presidents-have-better-economic-performance-than-republican-ones/

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Economic policy has a 3-4 year lag time until it's felt by the average citizen.

Biden has been picking up the pieces and putting the economy back together after the fiasco that was Trump. Just like Obama had to pick up the pieces after Bush, and Clinton had to after Reagan and Bush Sr.

To a lesser extent, Carter had to do the same, but Nixon and Ford didn't fuck the economy as hard as Reagan.

And if you go back a bit further, FDR pulled us out of the depression caused by Hoover, Coolidge and Harding.

The crash was due to the policy of Coolidge and Harding, but the depression, that was pure Hoover. He made a bad situation so much worse.

Kind of like Trump taking a pandemic, and making it worse.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 23 hours ago

Almost seems to be a pattern there, but I can't put my finger on it...

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

Neither can 49% of Americans!

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago

There is nothing normal about the Nazi Trump.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago

Alright. I'm starting to like this guy.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
616 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19047 readers
3988 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS