322
submitted 1 day ago by leadore@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The suit alleges the mandate violates the Oklahoma Constitution because it involves spending public money to support religion and favors one religion over another by requiring the use of a Protestant version of the Bible. It also alleges Walters and the state Board of Education don’t have the authority to require the use of instructional materials.

“As parents, my husband and I have sole responsibility to decide how and when our children learn about the Bible and religious teachings,” plaintiff Erika Wright, the founder of the Oklahoma Rural Schools Coalition and parent of two school-aged children, said in a statement. “It is not the role of any politician or public school official to intervene in these personal matters.”

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“The simple fact is that understanding how the Bible has impacted our nation, in its proper historical context, was the norm in America until the 1960s and its removal has coincided with a precipitous decline in American schools,” Walters wrote.

Wildly incorrect....

Pretty much the opposite really, "In God we trust" wasn't added to the mid 50s in response to the cold war.

Prior to that one of the foundational beliefs stayed true, separation of church and state.

They're confusing pushback to a new thing as people fighting against tradition

Something rightwing extremists do a lot of

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Where can I donate to their cause as an Oklahoman parent I support this lawsuit.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

They're not confusing anything, they're just straight up lying. Lying is a sin unless you do it, especially when to push your religion down others throats

Religions should be forbidden at this point, yes, I said what I said. I can't believe we're in 2024 and still the vast majority of the world is believing in a bunch of stone age fairytales that, if forced to start learning them at 20 would mostly get you laughter at the sheer stupidity of it. But we're force feeding this shit to damn near all the world's children, and as such, here we are thinking that any of this is acceptable.

Also, we gotta control theasses with something while they are suffering, a supernatural being giving you heaven for your suffering on earth is perfect.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 day ago

GOP: "stop indoctrinating our kids!!!"

also GOP: "we're forcing our bible on your kids LOL"

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

GOP: "Protect founding traditions."

also GOP: "Protects recent changes."

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Conservativism has always been a lie. There are no objectively conservative ideals. A conservative merely determines which status quo conditions they like and decides that those are the traditions that must be defended. It's narcissism dressed up as stoicism.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

I mean, it's better than nothing even if it does sound like Christians sueing Christians to keep the right to make their kids just the right kind of Christian.

Did all the atheists leave Oklahoma or are they simply forced into hiding?

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

It's a fallacy to think the loudest are the majority. I'm not saying it's not true in this case, it's just a flawed premise.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, surveys still suggest atheists (and "nones") in general are a minority in the US, although it's growing. But yeah, that's a true statement anyway.

I'd imagine Oklahoma is probably one of the worst, though there's a saying in atheist communities: fastest way to make someone athiest is to make them read the Bible. On that, they might be doing atheists a service, haha.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Religion is dying all over the world at a rapid pace.

[-] slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

As parents, my husband and I have sole responsibility to decide how and when our children learn about the Bible and religious teachings

I'm actually surprised this is the first time I've heard this argument, because there's a lot of parents who don't necessarily object to teaching the Bible in school, but are concerned that the way it's being taught in school differs from how it's taught at home. A Catholic would naturally have a problem with Protestant teachings in school, not to mention all of the different Protestant denominations.

I think, ultimately, that denominational infighting is what's going to sink this.

[-] Balthazar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I think, ultimately, that denominational infighting is what's going to sink this.

Isn't that the original idea behind the Establishment Clause? The founders weren't worried about religions, but denominations.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

They were descendants of people who fled England specifically because they didn’t like the official church and refused to pay taxes that support it.

[-] Balthazar@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

That's long before the Constitution. At the Founding, you have Congregationalists in New England, Presbyterians in New Jersey and Philly, Quakers in Pennsylvania, Catholics in Maryland, and Church of England and Methodists all throughout. Which denomination should the federal government support? None, they decided.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Fingers crossed.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
322 points (99.1% liked)

News

23190 readers
2924 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS