14
Except Harris actually wants to expand what is already the largest federal push to replace fossil fuels, and Trump wants to stop those programs.
One is better than the other.
the largest federal push to replace fossil fuels, and Trump wants to stop those programs.
trump wants to stop them cuz Biden did it ..
The fossil fuel companies want trump to keep it because it's making them so much money while they've set recording breaking production the last two years...
Republicans and moderates have lowered the bar so much since Jimmy Carter, that you can't even remember what a Dem candidate is supposed to look like
trump wants to stop them cuz Biden did it …
Generally speaking, this is exactly on point. If the GOP guy wins, he'll stop the program that Biden launched.
Then he'll work with the big rich companies to create a new program that has his name on it, that's even bigger and worse.
The fossil fuel companies want trump to keep it because it’s making them so much money while they’ve set recording breaking production the last two years…
Wait, so the fossil fuel companies want to keep Biden's push to replace fossil fuels? Because it's been making them money?
Actually, that's good. If even the fossil fuel companies want them replaced...
Republicans and moderates have lowered the bar so much since Jimmy Carter, that you can’t even remember what a Dem candidate is supposed to look like
My answer: AOC
You mean the one that now says she supports fracking? The one helping contribute via proxy war hundreds of thousands of tons of carbon into the atmosphere?
Yes, that one who has allowed her views to evolve and showing a willingness to compromise to show she'll support the wishes of everyone in the US.
Of the two, who has better odds on (for example) being convinced to return to a ban on fracking? The one who previously sought to ban it, or the one who racistly said that climate change was a hoax from a particular country half way around the world?
Fossil fuel corporations have asked trump to leave Biden's "signature climate legislation" if trump wins, because it's making them so much money...
And Harris is explicitly pro-fracking, has been since she cast the vote that prevented it from being banned.
What's the point of winning if we don't fix stuff after we do?
I optimistically have hope that things will get fixed, once Dems are able to drop the filibuster so new legislation at the federal level is possible again.
Though that depends on Dems retaining the Senate in this election, or taking it back in 2026.
Climate change if a defining issue in this election? What? Since when?
TruthOut - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for TruthOut:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://truthout.org/articles/as-trump-and-harris-vie-for-fossil-fuel-supporters-the-climate-is-losing/
The climate is already lost. It's pretty much a non-issue. It's just a matter of who can keep us from dying the fastest.
How we act now will determine how hard the landing is.
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
14 points (68.4% liked)
politics
19246 readers
2813 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS