1243
submitted 2 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 384 points 2 months ago

Wow, a hugely wealthy oligarchical capitalist facilitating the rise of fascism?

How completely unpredictable, with no historical precedent whatsoever!

Who could have possibly expected this?!

[-] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 68 points 2 months ago

Certainly not Prescott Bush!

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 92 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Man... that's one of the things that seems like a conspiracy theory to a great many people, but just actually is true.

Dude literally got caught doing massive amounts of money laundering for literal Nazis during WW2 and by all rights should have been convicted of treason.

Its like how most people don't know that IBM machines enabled the Germans to tabulate and keep track of the holocaust, that their machines spit out the UIDs that were tattooed onto the victims at the death camps....

... I think that 'War is a Racket' by Smedley Butler really needs to be added to the basic K-12 curriculum alongside 1984 and Brave New World...

But oh oops, the Republicans already destroyed our education systems, nevermind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 57 points 2 months ago

How much money do these fuckers need before they are content enough to not rat fuck American democracy so they can eek out a few percent more on their billions?

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 months ago

... The answer is infinity.

Capitalism requires constant growth, constant extraction, constant return in investment, constant tendency toward monopolies and wealth disparity until you end up with a neo feudalistic caste society.

You can either attempt to restrain and regulate the system, which we are currently doing a rather poor job of, overthrow the system, which is nigh impossible given the precarity of the average prole, or you can just watch as we head closer and closer to... some kind of hybrid of the handmaids tale and elysium.

... Or, maybe, escape to a slightly less insane foreign country, but you're gonna need a lot of money or a very lucrative skill set as an employee to do that as anything other than an illegal immigrant.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

The motto of the Post is literally “Democracy dies in Darkness”, and it was adopted immediately after Trump was elected. It is deliberately positioned as pro-Democrat and anti Trump. I didn’t have a high esteem of Bezos, but I am still disappointed.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 199 points 2 months ago

Has this f*ing idiot never heard of the Streisand Effect? The fact that they broke a decades long tradition to do this makes a louder thump than their endorsement would have.

[-] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 months ago

Louder to people who know who they're voting for already

Quieter to people on the fence

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 163 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The Washington Post: "Democracy Dies in Darkness"

Bozos:

Turn the Light off, turn the light off.

I had to settle for the Jurassic Park GIF because I couldn't find the one of Homer Simpson using his gun to turn off the lights. If anyone has that GIF, please hook me up.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

I know this isn’t intentional, but the broken image makes the comment 10x funnier.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

LOL. Task failed successfully!

I just re-linked the GIF to go through my image proxy (originally linked directly from yarn.io which usually works fine. Usually.). Did that help?

It's also weird that it's not showing the alt text. Figured that'd have at least come through.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No shooting, but does this work? Homer gets a light bulb to the head

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 months ago

Democracy Dies in Darkness

We just didn't realize this was a mission statement.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] kelargo@lemmy.world 118 points 2 months ago
[-] LordGimp@lemm.ee 69 points 2 months ago

Anyone with over 10 million dollars in wealth should be legally classified as a dragon and anyone stealing from their hoard shall not be punishable under the law.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not so fun fact: The absolute richest dragons in all of fantasy, excluding Smaug, only have a net worth of several hundred million dollars. A Red Elder Wyrm will have, on average, around 2.5-3 million gold pieces of wealth, with an absolute maximum of 5 million gold pieces. That means that the absolute greediest, and richest type of dragon, by far, only has between 100,000 to 500,000 oz worth of gold.

Smaug being the absolute outlier because he had somewhere between 5 to 10 billion dollars worth of gold.

Now if you are wondering why I'm making a big deal about this, it is because 500,000 oz of gold is only worth about 1.1 billion US dollars. But that is the absolute outlier of the greediest type of dragon that there is. Still only looking at Chaotic Evil Red Elder Wyrms, the average would only be about 3.5 million gold pieces, or a mere 350,000 oz of gold. That's only about $850,000,000 and that is just the most average of the absolute greediest manefestations of greed that our limited minds could imagine. Most dragons would be absolutely fine with between $1,000,000 to $10,000,000. The literal manefestations of greed don't need more than $10,000,000 according to every treasure table.

Those people that have more than 100 million dollars have already passed the greed alignment chart into Chaotic Evil. They are damn near caricatures of dragons at this point.

[-] LordGimp@lemm.ee 29 points 2 months ago

My favorite is always the Egyptian god deciding to save the equivalent of $10,000 usd every day and never spend a single penny of it back in 10,000 BC and they still don't have as much money as Jeff Bozos.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Maximum wealth law. Once you're worth more than 100 million, 100% of any new income goes to a designated fund for social programs.

100 million is enough money that there is still no real limit to how pampered your life can be, so there's no argument that the rule would hurt anyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 116 points 2 months ago

Rep. Ted Lieu, a Democrat from California, in his own tweet on the news wrote, “The first step towards fascism is when the free press cowers in fear.”

I don't know if this is the free press cowering, or the free press being bought out by rich people. Either way, it's some bullshit.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago

Private ownership of a news outlet breaks every definition of "free" in "free press".

A "free press" no longer exists.

[-] Microw@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago

Eh.. no? Most free press is privately owned. Just not by billionaires who influence the content.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bzarb8ni@lemm.ee 85 points 2 months ago

“The most consequential election in our country, a choice between Fascism and Democracy, and you sit out? Cowards. Unethical, fearful cowards,” wrote one reader.

Haha, yep.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 83 points 2 months ago

Oh man the first 3 words got me excited.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 79 points 2 months ago

Also, cancel your prime subscriptions you cowards!

[-] Consumer2747@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Anyone who’s still using Amazon and wants to keep democracy is drowning in cognitive dissonance. Amazon is a bigger threat to decent lives for non-millionaires than any single politician, even granting that Trump is a nightmare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 68 points 2 months ago

Sigh.

Canceled my subscription.

[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Just spoke to my parents. Uninterrupted subscribers since '73.

I called them right after canceling my own subscription and they'd already canceled theirs.

I hope Bezos is happy losing 51-year patrons of his paper.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago

Bezos has tons of federal government contracts. When Trump was president last time he went after Amazon and others he disliked to get their contracts cancelled. Bezos is concerned that if Trump wins, Trump could fuck with his contracts.

That's the reason. It's fucked up and more evidence of why news media shouldn't be owned by fuckhead billionaires. Shameful day in WaPos history. Cowardice. Grovelling to placate Trump for the benefit of the paper 's owner.

Tin foil hat: I am somewhat concerned that our oligarch overlords seem to be hedging in a way that they think Trump might win.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 55 points 2 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 48 points 2 months ago

This is that "liberal news media" that Republicans keep yammering on about.

The one that's owned by six corporations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jared@mander.xyz 47 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

If Kamala really wanted to get back at Bezos for this, the best thing she could do is promote union membership in tech and in the press.

It has been Bezos' kryptonite for years, and while I hold zero hope that unions will grow in popularity in the US, having a president push for them might be enough to make big businesses shut up.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 39 points 2 months ago

She shouldn't be "getting back" at people. That's Trump's MO, and a major part of the reason that makes him so unsuited for the role. She should do what's best for the country. So ultimately I agree she should be pushing for unions.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

tax them until they learn to mind their own business

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Encode1307@lemm.ee 41 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well that subscription is cancelled

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Jeff Bezos killed

Well this should be interesting.

Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris, paper reports

Oh, nevermind.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 months ago

There should be a law for owners of media being kept at arm's length.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

Free press in the USA? LOL, it becomes more and more difficult every time a US oligarch buys a news outlet.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 36 points 2 months ago
[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 2 months ago

If only wish luthor would fight temu iron Man

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] savx@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

for years tech bros has been framed as liberal/leftist/team blue supporter. but after years of musk shitposting bullshit and almost not even single one called him out, more and more i have a feeling that they ALL are just magas hiding in the closets, they are not allies at all.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They're mostly self-styled "libertarians", which means they haven't thought anything through, think they know better than all the country's institutions, and just want to be allowed to do whatever they want without consequences. This makes them natural allies of the MAGAs, even if they don't realize it.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago

Everyone talking about billionaires and how they endorse, support, finance, fund, hold lotteries to influence an election and everyone still thinks they exist in a democracy.

It's an oligarchy or a plutocracy

Call it whatever you want ... but it certainly isn't a democracy

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
1243 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2130 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS