232

“If you go to Payless, or go wherever, it says sample and you usually can take a sample,” Savage said, according to Fox59. “So that is the way I took it. I thought they were fake fucking ballots.”

Speaking with Fox59, Savage claimed that he was an elected official and that he was “just trying to fight for our country.” (Savage, a businessman, came sixth out of eight candidates in the Republican primary.)

Madison County Prosecutor Rodney Cummings said that Savage’s act was a deliberate attempt to “undermine our election process.”

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago

Is this dude stealing shoes from Payless?

[-] Samsonreturns@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

There is a local liquor store called Payless Liquor... Got a strong feeling that's who he is talking about

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago
[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

Well until they had to close up shop because he stole all their shoes.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 40 points 1 month ago
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

“Are you guys on MySpace, or…”

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago
[-] phar@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

We get it, you're from space Australia

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Ima super saiyan.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

Well yeah. This guy took all the "free samples". Of course it closed down.

[-] Cptmurph616@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

I’d hate to defend this chucklefuck, but Payless is the name for some Kroger grocery stores in Indiana.

[-] Samsonreturns@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

There is a liquor store chain called Payless Liquor

[-] Cptmurph616@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

If the old owner of Payless Liquors was still alive, he’d probably give free booze to this bozo for stealing ballots

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Shitty thing done shittily. Still more worried about the ones who aren't incompetent clowns but good to know that whoever's supervising isn't completely blind.

[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

He is full of shit, for sure. But let's say we take his claim at face value, that level of stupidity has no business in political power. So, lose-lose.

That is on par with most of political scandals and the defenses given, they are either clearly in on the fuckery, or so monumentally stupid that they were unaware of it happening around them or that it was illegal/immoral. There is no answer that gets them off the hook and provides confidence in their abilities.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

It is weird that they were called samples. But he can't have been "trying to fight for our country" while simultaneously believing they were fake ballots, so, get jailed loser

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Isn’t this the guy recorded on live video asking if they were real or fake, and after being assured they were real, waited until nobody was watching, looked around, then grabbed the two ballots and hid them, and was later filmed telling another guy that the ballots were off by two, and that he had them?

How exactly does that LIVE video footage match his story?

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that pretty much sums it up. There's no way to reconcile what he's saying with the video evidence.

Several citizens were permitted to run “test” ballots through machines assigned to their county, including Savage, who was spotted on camera folding the ballots into his pocket while confirming with an election official that they were “absolutely, totally real ballots.” Although they weren’t official ballots, the ballots did not say “fake” or “sample” and were being tracked and counted by the state.

[-] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Larry L. Savage Jr. in Indiana

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

The New Republic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The New Republic:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New Republic is generally reliable. Most editors consider The New Republic biased or opinionated. Opinions in the magazine should be attributed.


MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


The New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The New York Times:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New York Times is generally reliable. WP:RSOPINION should be used to evaluate opinion columns, while WP:NEWSBLOG should be used for the blogs on The New York Times's website. The 2018 RfC cites WP:MEDPOP to establish that popular press sources such as The New York Times should generally not be used to support medical claims.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://newrepublic.com/post/187711/ex-republican-candidate-defense-stealing-ballots
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/05/07/us/elections/results-indiana-us-house-5-primary.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
232 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19244 readers
3387 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS