167
submitted 4 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

President-elect Donald J. Trump’s team will have some formal briefings with outgoing staff members, but it has so far refused to allow the F.B.I. to do security clearances for transition members.

Very likely because much of their team can't pass a background check, and they know it.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 96 points 4 weeks ago

The fact that these aren't hard requirements in our modern society is inexcusable.

If there's anything his Administrations have shown, it is that WAYYYYY too much of our government operates on gentleman's agreements and norms, not actual rules and requirements.

[-] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 48 points 4 weeks ago

Only for the elites, though. The rank and file still very much have requirements that must be met for employment.

[-] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 weeks ago

And when when things are codified if they refuse to enforce them they might as well not be.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 weeks ago

Laws can only do so much. The founders knew that. They are just words and paper.

We the people chose this. Why and how are moot. We didn't hold our leaders accountable. Now, we see how far Trump will go, because there are no actual checks on his power. He can literally drag Congress members into the street and shoot them without consequences. And half the country will cheer.

[-] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 29 points 4 weeks ago

How the fuck is this possible

[-] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 4 weeks ago

Only liberals believe laws and rules should be followed. Fascists do not believe this, but they’re happy to play along and pretend they do until liberals give them all the power.

[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

As Jon Stewart put it: Republicans rely on loopholes, Democrats rely on norms.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 weeks ago

That'll be because they're all spies and crooks.

[-] islands@lemmy.cafe 18 points 4 weeks ago

I mean... just do it anyways. Investigate them. They might refuse to sit down for interviews but dig up what you can. Hack them if you can, the American people deserve to know what skeletons these weirdo's have in their closets.

[-] Dragomus@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

Yes, since when does the FBI need permission from a non-president? Until he sits in the chair the upcoming regime should have nothing to say against legit investigations.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

When RFK was asked by a journalist recently about his sexual assault allegations, he responded- "I said in my announcement speech that I have so many skeletons in my closet that if they could all vote, I could run for king of the world."

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago

Why is this even being allowed?

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 weeks ago

Why did Biden not make all these "rule of thumbs" into law at some point? Does that need to be done by house/senate which would have been killed by Republicans?

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago
  1. Because presidents don't make laws, so yes congress would need to pass new legislation. Depending on what you mean by "rules of thumb".
  2. Because many of these are not rules of thumb but actual regulations. E.g. without the FBI clearances classified information can't be shared and without an agreement with the GSA they can't get office space or logistical support (as the article notes).

I'm curious what you are thinking of when you say "rules of thumb(s)"

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

They well know that such a process would cause unwanted questions.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
167 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2783 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS