165
submitted 2 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

Remember that scene at the beginning of It's a Wonderful Life, where people are all desperately trying to get into the bank because if it fails before they get in, they lose their money? That's what the FDIC prevents.

This post uses a gift link which may have a view count limit. If it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article available

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 63 points 2 weeks ago

Calling it now.

2026 with the economy in free fall and the Republicans about to be voted out of office, he will make his move to fully seize control and declare martial law to stop elections.

The moves they are talking about will absolutely destroy the economy and plunge us into the abyss.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 2 weeks ago

Man I beat you to that by at least a month.

[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 6 points 2 weeks ago

I guess the positive is that if the economy is that fucked they might not have the money to resist the guillotine crazed hordes. Personally I think an ill measured rope would be the best method

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

2026 with the economy in free fall and the Republicans about to be voted out of office

That won't stop the Y'all Qaeda dumb fucks from doubling down and voting in a republican super majority in the house and senate.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

or another financial crash/bailout in 5-10 years

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Remember that scene at the beginning of It’s a Wonderful Life, where people are all desperately trying to get into the bank because if it fails before they get in, they lose their money? That’s what the FDIC prevents.

Yeah. FDIC insurance is the only reason each of us will be left with up to ~~100k~~ 250k per bank account, if our banks go under. And most of us have less than 100k in savings, so it's basically the US government saying

Don't worry, even if shit hits the fan, you will still have your money.

I can't even be bothered to hear how his minions are going to defend this one. It's indefensible.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

They won't defend it. They have torn out their ear drums to criticism. They will hear no evil about the man.

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

It’s 100k per account per bank, IIRC

[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

You did not remember correctly. This is disclosed on every savings account with a bank that is insured by the FDIC. The limit was raised several years ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What backs or gurantees the FDIC?

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's a little hard to parse, but if you're asking "What guarantees the FDIC has the money to pay back Americans who lose their savings because of a bank collapse?": The FDIC does. From https://www.fdic.gov/about/what-we-do:

The FDIC receives no Congressional appropriations - it is funded by premiums that banks and savings associations pay for deposit insurance coverage. The FDIC insures trillions of dollars of deposits in U.S. banks and thrifts - deposits in virtually every bank and savings association in the country.

FDIC insurance is a selling point for many retail banking products (like checking and savings accounts), so those institutions pay for the insurance so people will have confidence to bank there. More importantly, they buy it because it's required by law currently.

If the FDIC were abolished, the void would be filled by unregulated entities that would charge higher premiums and cover less, and there would probably be kickbacks involved - while the government watches with its popcorn - to disincentivise real free market competition.

That's if there were any kind of deposit insurance at all, I mean. The idea might be to encourage the American people to put their savings into a form they can retain control over - like precious metals, land, or digital currencies.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

There's also an implicit guarantee that the federal government would step in an make deposits good if there were a bank failure large enough to wipe out the FDIC

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

MAGAts talk about Trump Derangement Syndrome but "conservatives" are still trying to destroy everything FDR helped create. That's how far the FDIC goes back. This is why they want to do away with physical cash. Can't have a run on a bank if your electronic money just suddenly disappears.

[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 3 points 1 week ago

Its the setup to the biggest robbery in history!

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, they take the very, very, very long view at destroying anything and everything that they think is costing them one red cent.

The qons hold derangement syndrome towards a great many things going back decades...

[-] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 weeks ago

How does this spin to customers?

Okay, my checking account is no longer guaranteed in the event of your inevitable ambition-related collapse. Are you going to pay me speculative-investment class interest rates to justify me trusting you with the money? Or should I just go back to notes under the mattress?

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Trump, probably, after talking to his new bestest advisor:

Just move all your money into Dogecoin. It will be perfectly safe there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

There's no way that happens without full on revolt.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 22 points 2 weeks ago

I might have said something like that 8 years ago but now ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 2 weeks ago
[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They did paste it correctly but in Markdown, you have to type three. The first one escapes the second, and the third one escapes the underscore and prevents the pair from becoming an italics flag.

1: ¯_(ツ)_/¯
2: ¯\(ツ)
3: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The examples above are slightly fake: the unescaped right underscores in lines 1 and 3 would mark the start and end of another italics segment, so I escaped them to imitate what happens in a comment with no underscores except this kaomoji.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

A little bullshit story from Trump and Fox about how our tax dollars insure other people's bad decisions and it's toast.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If they can tie it to Obama/Biden/Kamala/Clinton or POC in general or something trans, that'll really end it.

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I said that a few freakouts ago, bud.

[-] Zementid@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This will isolate american banks on the long run. Who wants to make business with Leeman Brothers 2.0 (on an international scale)... or did I miss something?

Edit: Spelling

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

We still have bank failures now, Silicon Valley bank? Why eliminate it?

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I'm guessing because 1) dumb ideological reasons involving cutting every government service that isn't the military or immigration enforcement and 2) FDIC is primarily funded by fees from the banks. Consumers are so detached from how stuff works for the most part that removing the FDIC insurance fee wouldn't give consumers higher interest rates, but just decrease the banks expenses and make them more money.

[-] Yodan@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

If you haven't noticed elon wants to grift crypto via the government so by eliminating oversight and forcing people to run the bank, guess what kinds of assets people will dump their digital dollars into?

[-] Cargon@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

How does this relate, if at all, with the insurance that the NCUA provides?

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

let me guess. they would not touch spic.

[-] Yodan@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

So they want us to buy crypto? If no bank and not enough cash to go around, digital money has to go somewhere right? Buy commodities? Cans of food/medical supplies to sell during the inevitable depression?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
165 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2667 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS