29
submitted 1 day ago by sith@lemmy.zip to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

"I think they’re way too obsessed with appealing to these very far-left social progressivism that’s very popular on college campuses."

The fuck?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Context:

The focus groups — held immediately after the 2024 election and conducted by GBAO, a Democratic polling firm — featured three kinds of voters: young men in battleground states who voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024; voters in battleground states who voted for Biden in 2020 but didn’t vote at all in 2024; and voters in blue states who had previously voted for Democrats, a third party candidate or didn’t vote in 2020 but voted for Trump in 2024.

"I think what the Democratic elites and their politicians believe is often very different from what the average Democratic voter is,” said a Georgia man who voted for Biden in 2020 but Trump in 2024. “The elites that run the Democratic Party — I think they’re way too obsessed with appealing to these very far-left social progressivism that’s very popular on college campuses.”

The only way they could get people to complain about "social issues" is asking people that voted trump

The important parts (that they gloss over) is everyone is turned off by neoliberal elitism.

And courting Republicans won't work because of "social issues" meaning minority groups should be treated equally. That's non-negotiable for the bulk of the party voters, so it's not an option and it means courting republicans is pointless.

But I expect the DNC to ignore everything else and try to just move right on "social issues".

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

The only way they could get people to complain about "social issues" is asking people that voted trump

Well, he won the election. If you want to find out why, you ask the people who voted for him, as well as people who didn't vote for either candidate.

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

That’s their point though - somebody voting for trump is clearly not a rational actor, while those that didn’t vote at all would be easier to convince.

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com -2 points 1 day ago

If you think they're not rational, then you'll have to appeal to those who you think aren't rational. If you want to win the election that is.

[-] sith@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I believe most people overestimate intellectual and conscious rationality. Among themselves and others. The rationalizing is usually there afterwards. To justify current emotions, actions and circumstances.

Self preservation, since one can't control much anyways. And one needs a somewhat coherent world view.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Sorry, I misread your comment.

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

What's do you think the point is?

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Next Dem candidate is gonna pledge to staff her entire cabinet with Republicans and seek an endorsement from George Bush, don't you worry

[-] evenglow@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

“This weakness they see, [Democrats] not getting things done, not being able to actually fight for people — is something that needs to be figured out,” Russell said. “It might not be the message, it might be the policy. It might be something a little bit deeper that has to be addressed by the party.”

People see Democrat failure. They do not see Republican sabotage.

[-] sith@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago

I find it quite simple. Voters are economic left/progressive and social right/conservative. Center left parties are economic center and social left. The trend is similar in all western countries. And it's a bad match.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's only one economic platform the US is allowed to have, but seemingly unlimited social platforms. The ownership class doesn't care about social issues as long as it doesn't affect their bank accounts so we're free to have variety there. So we're stuck with two parties that barely differ on economic platforms and focus all their differences on social issues. Since the Dems aren't allowed to make needed economic changes they "have" to try to compete in the social realm. Let's see how far right they move in that respect now...

Fun stuff :/

[-] sith@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
29 points (87.2% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2243 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS