Everyone here thinking the reason they were dropped was because the quality turned to shit after the buyout, but the main reason is their continued presence operating in Russia after their thankfully failed attempt to annex Ukraine. I'm pleased the royals took a stand. Ultimately both are good reasons to drop them.
Everyone here thinking the reason they were dropped was because the quality turned to shit
But how else am I supposed to show my really cool and deep personality of hating anything vaguely popular?
It's shit chocolate now, I can fully understand it.
Kraft is the death of quality.
Whenever I hear Kraft I instantly think of a block of cooking fat. With Cadbury it's the same block of fat but brown.
This shouldn't come as a surprise. Since its takeover by Kraft/Mondelez their chocolate has become poorer quality. As soon as the Cadbury name was being licenced to various other diversified food products (ice cream, cakes etc.) it was a sign of what was to come. Sad. Still not as bad as Hershey's though.
I use the same metric for videogames. The instant they're buying up other companies' IP to sell skins, they're cooked.
Can someone explain to me what is this warrant list? What does it bring to companies in it?
It's like "the official chocolate company of the Philadelphia Eagles".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_warrant_of_appointment_(United_Kingdom)
The warrant enables the supplier to advertise that they supply to the royal family.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_royal_warrant_holders_of_the_British_royal_family
Gotcha so nothing burger then.
There is absolutely no reason why anyone in the world should give a shit about some irrelevant family.
Like it or not (personally I don't) lots of brits care about them. And a surprising amount of non brits too
Sure but it’s an extreme minority. This is like caring what the kardashians are doing.
That is, unfortunately, not an extreme minority.
Get out of your bubble. There are 8 billion people on the planet. The combination of the people who care about the Royale family and the kardashians is a minority.
No, but it implies that the brand has attained a certain level of quality to the point where some rich pleb sponges have decided they rather like it. The papers want to know who's shirts you wear...
Surprised it didn't happen sooner. Americans don't do chocolate well. They should stick to going to the moon.
Here's a little explanation as to the differences with US chocolate.
The bit about Butyric Acid explains why US chocolate tastes literally like vomit; it's the component in vomit that gives it the distinctive taste and smell.
When Hershey's products came to the UK they initially had to be relabelled to reflect the extremely low cocoa content and be called "chocolate flavored candy bar".
Ironically, the article references Cadbury.
Hey! Do you Europeans not appreciate corn in your chocolate or something?!
You put a bit of corn in their bread and they legally declare it cake. Can’t win with them
Huh? Are you trying to take a swing at corn bread cuz homie, every southern matriarch would like a word. Don't shit on corn bread lol. But for real what is the connection between corn, chocolate and cake. I'll be the first to admit candy corn is candy from Satan's anus. The closest I can gather is carrot cake and that shit is just as good as corn bread if not better.
i’d say it’s because when you put HFCS in bread in a lot of countries it categorises the thing as cake as far as regulations are concerned
👆
I'm not being snarky, I swear. But Cadbury eggs were/are super gross. Were those made in America for Americans and you get a different product?
Never saw the hype behind those.
I'll be real though: chocolate is expensive as fuck and not worth the money.
Creme eggs have been around for 60-odd years. They're crazy sweet and not very high-quality – especially after the Kraft acquisition, as it's not even Cadbury's Dairy Milk any more.
What you get in the US are smaller and made over there by Hershey, so frankly they're probably as bad or worse, but you're not missing out on much.
Huh? Some of the best chocolate is Ghirardelli which is American.
Maybe you just don’t understand American chocolate.
It's a Swiss-owned company originally founded by an Italian in... barely the US. Two years after California joined the union.
A kilo for forty bucks. Are you kidding me. That's way too cheap to be good cocoa, actually good chocolate costs 150-200 per kg.
milk fat, vanilla extract, natural flavor, soy lecithin.
...it gets worse and worse. You want to see none of those in good chocolate. But at least Lindt checks out as an owner they upcharge you for the gold paint on the packaging and also use cheap cocoa.
Go to Aldi. Buy Moser-Roth. Same quality, priced sensibly. Or treat yourself and buy something from Domori.
Why does anyone give a shit about a parasite's tier list? Charlie don't like Cadbury? Meh.
Oooooookay then.
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link