194
submitted 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by brucethemoose@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Trump, who has remained silent thus far on the schism, faces a quickly deepening conflict between his richest and most powerful advisors on one hand, and the people who swept him to office on the other.

All this is stupid. But I know one thing:

Trump is a billionaire.

And I predict his followers are going to learn who he’ll side with when push comes to shove.

Also, Bannon’s take is interesting:

Bannon tells Axios he helped kick off the debate with a now-viral Gettr post earlier this month calling out a lack of support for the Black and Hispanic communities in Big Tech.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 11 points 8 hours ago

A racist calling those racist racist only makes them more racist.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago

Oh no! I thought calling someone else a racist, justified or not, was the very worstest thing you could do!

Is Elon infected with the WOKE MIND VIRUS?

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 60 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

No one believes he is standing up against racism while he is vocally and financially supporting the neo-Nazis AfD in Germany and Nigel Farage's racist far right in the UK, and working for and funding lifelong racist Donald Trump. Elon Musk's companies also have a known history of institutionalized racism. What he is taking a stand for is the ability to exploit and abuse cheap foreign employees by threatening them with deportation if they get out of line.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 21 points 13 hours ago

I've tried to eschew phrasing like "No one believes" or "Everyone knows" because a whole lot of asshats live in a fantastical world completely divorced from reality.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 113 points 15 hours ago

H-1B is basically cheap corporate servitude, no wonder Musk likes it.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 80 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

“Do as you’re told, or you’re deported.” Nope, no potential for corporate abuse there.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 39 points 14 hours ago

Can't forget "Burn through employees, and then deport them." Use and discard.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 hours ago

Gotta keep up the churn so the wages you’ve depressed with imported servants let you hire back for cheaper.

[-] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 12 hours ago

Dude I knew was on one and essentially told me if he lost his job they’d just deport him

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 21 points 12 hours ago

I worked with a guy for 3 years (who had been there years before me) who then was told something was messed up on his paperwork and to continue a path to citizenship he had to leave the country for 6+ months and start the process over.

He has to sell his house and car and move everything into a storage unit and take his kid out of school all inside of 30 days and then leave.

He's back now and a citizen, but what a mess.

[-] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yeah the h1b program is great in theory - if someone on another side of the border has learned a tech skill I say let em compete.

The problem is that employers know that if they sponsor a visa they basically own that person. If they fire them it’s 60 days before they have to have sold everything and be gone or they risk a 3 year ban for unlawful presence. They can technically find another sponsor in that time but good fucking luck.

It’s almost comically created to give employers a nice exploitable workforce instead of putting them on par with other employees. They can pay shit and put huge workloads on them and it’s “suck it up or we’ll replace you with the one of the 10,000 people we turned down for the visa.”

I’ll compete with other skilled workers for a job but if you put a big “you can abuse this one tho cuz he probs brown” sticker on the foreign workers I get upset.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

I think it's mostly built around trumped-up nonsense from corporations. It's about controlling what might be an unruly set of people - engineers starting to demand better pay and hours and having too much autonomy. Many of those visas go to software engineers. I don't buy for a second that companies cannot source those skills locally.

In the rare case where that is actually true - I say put together a program in which companies can seek and hire foreign talent, but they are given citizenship status, with no strings attached to any company.

Indentured servitude should not be a thing, but this is what regulatory capture gets us, I guess. Companies whine they cannot find anyone (for the right price and willing to put up with all their toxic bullshit, they mean) so the corrupt government sets up a system to exploit foreign labor AND native labor.

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

You're one of the good ones.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 70 points 14 hours ago

Muskrat is losing it and it's glorious

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 37 points 12 hours ago

"I'll go to war to replace American workers with H1B indentured servants"

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

Musk might be rich, but he doesn't have a fucking military. And he's not "Have a Military" rich. Not one that can stand to the US military, anyways.

What a dunce.

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago

To be fair, he is not saying "war" like "send a military to kill people".

It's a metaphorical war. He'll probably throw a fit and tell people to do a bunch of shitty stuff, fund terrible things, etc..

[-] capital@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Maybe he should consider toning I down after the healthcare ceo thing?

Meh. Actually, keep it up.

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Hard to fight either from a k-hole.

[-] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

He might even pen some irritated tweets!

[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Babes, don't even doubt he'll pen some irritated tweets.

Billionaires will cease to exist before Musk refuses to tweet something stupid.

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 24 points 12 hours ago

Bannon is an accelerationist who believes in the inevitability of and is trying to bring about a race war.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

I hate that Bannon has the right position on H-1B, but for very stupid and irrelevant reasons.

[-] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 hours ago

Broken clocks and all that.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 51 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

On Friday afternoon, Musk doubled down, saying MAGA adherents who continued to blast immigration and the tech community were "contemptible fools," later clarifying he was talking about "racists" who would "absolutely be the downfall of the Republican Party if they are not removed."

Okay first, "contemptable fools" sure sounds like it could be replaced with "basket of deplorables" to me.

Second, did he really just notice that MAGA/Republican party is made up of racists? I thought this guy was supposed to be smart.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 31 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I think there's no way Musk isn't a racist, he just kinda hides it from public view. He thinks he can shame others to do what he wants by calling them racist (remember when he calls people pedos?), but that won't work. Certain ideologies literally have no shame.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago

Musk is definitely racist, and his support for H1B is a feature of that racism. He thinks "those orientals and Indians" are good at tech and "hardcore." H1B lets him bring them over, treat them like slaves, and send them back home if they get uppity.

MAGAs would feel the same about immigrants in agriculture and hospitality, if they thought there was a reliable way to send them back home at the end of the workday.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago

Whoa whoa whoa. The apartheid trust fund baby racist?! Like you didn't steal and hock daddy's emeralds to get your start like everyone else did.

And yes that's literally how Elon got started in the us. He'd be lucky to be flipping burgers if he wasn't born with wealth and privilege.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

First, maybe Clinton and Musk have more in common than Musk or Trump supporters realized until now…

Second, he knows. He owns Twitter and their massive analytics apparatus, he probably knows more than most people on the planet. But I think musk is half blustering, and half frustrated Trump World is trying to do what it campaigned on instead of bowing to him.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Musk once understood very well that Dems were good for business as they subsided electric cars and space exploration. Over time he became upset with the Dem policies especially on transgender issues (due to his transgender daughter), and more full of himself. He convinced himself that his business, which essentially exist on state support, could thrive without it. Leopards are now eating his face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dotdi@lemmy.world 37 points 14 hours ago

Trump is not a billionaire!

He’s a con artist that likes to make people believe he’s a billionaire. Did you forget he barely made payments that he was court-ordered to pay? Even going as far as looking for people to pay it for him in return for favorable political treatment once he’s in office?

Pepperidge farm remembers.

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

You have to wonder how much money he does actually have. It's certainly enough to live like a rich person. And he surely will make more now that he won the presidency again.

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

He can’t even organize enough to get a couple grand for venues. Even if he has money, he’s got shit spending habits on shit taste. For sure the guy who wants you to Venmo him for the coffee you had at lunch.

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

He's never been one to pay his bills. His whole thing is making people sue him for the money he owes them and then dragging out the legal process until it's not worth it for them anymore.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

He is right calling the GOP racists. But that is the pot calling the kettle "black".

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 44 points 15 hours ago

Does he think Maga cares?

They're openly racist and are proud of it, Elmo buying Twitter was a large part of them feeling comfortable to go mask off.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago

This dust up over HB1 is my favorite Christmas present. Seeing Vivak and Elon elitesplain why immigrants are good to MAGA is never going to get old.

We need to keep this issue in the cycle. Can we get Jefferies to declare that expanding HB1 is the Democrats top priority? Perhaps introduce legislation to loosen the restrictions on H1Bs.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

If we fix our higher education system, companies could hire citizens. Even then though, I think a lot of companies abuse the H1B system, because they can pay less. (You are supposed to have to make a case that no US worker could fill that job role.)

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

Maybe it’s a prelude to a larger class war, when MAGA realizes they basically voted in a billionaretocracy, and wants it out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 10 points 13 hours ago

Some great points made by users in this thread, but my main question from reading this was, "What the hell is Gettr?"

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago

The apartheid nepo baby is calling other people racist? That's cute.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

They always need to be at war with some element of American society. Since Dems are largely taking a break and waiting for the Find Out part of this disaster, they're going to have to quench their thirst by going to war with each other.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
194 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2179 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS