How the Democrats wandered away from America’s workers (www.economist.com)

submitted 6 days ago by Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] threesigma@lemm.ee 37 points 6 days ago

Not signing up. But I’ll take a guess. “Democrats chose to embrace trans people” (even though they remained closed-lipped), “didn’t court conservative voters” (even though they did), “didn’t tout their achievements with kitchen-table economic issues” (even though they did relentlessly), “didn’t embrace labor” (even though the Rs were actively hostile). The “centrists” got exactly the campaign they wanted but still want to say the left was too left.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I think the original sin was that democrats after Reagan felt they needed to court big business and so Bill Clinton passed NAFTA. NAFTA basically gutted the middle class and accelerated the erosion of union power, which had been the base of democratic power as well. So, the Republican Party now has both the ultra wealthy and the white working poor. This is pretty remarkable given that their interests do not align at all.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago

After Reagan broke the unions. The funding had to come from somewhere. That's why Clinton courted the oligarchs. Before Reagan did that, Democrats were heavily funded by, and campaigned for by unions. As Unions and their funds dried up. Democrats weren't going to pay for media space with fairy dust and farts. But it was still necessary to reach the average disengaged insulated American. Which is most of us.

People really have no idea what the situation is. Pointing to record amounts gathered from small donors in election years. Thinking that should be enough. Without realizing that Republicans/conservatives/oligarchs spend multiples of that amount A YEAR. EVERY YEAR!

People wonder how others can vote for someone so obviously bad. Their mistake is thinking its obvious. There's a reason conservatives spent the last 40 years creating purposefully partisan outlets and allowing media consolidation. He who controls the media, controls perception.

[-] WeUnite@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

It's shocking how often people blame Democrats for things which are clearly Republicans' fault. If Democrats had better margins and were elected more often working class people would have much better lives.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Yes. There's still plenty to critique Democrats on. But so many want to crucify Democrats for seeking funding that they don't like. But they won't acknowledge the fact that they don't provide the sort of resources so they don't have to.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

The article opens up talking about NAFTA, so at least it's starting from the right angle: policy and international forces.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Well, Republicans are more likely to identify as working class than Democrats.

[-] trajekolus@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

So you admit to not reading the article, but still proceed to critique what you assume it contains. And get up voted!

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Nobody read the article and he said what people want to hear.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago

Buncha crap.

RepubliQans built an entire Potemkin media landscape and scraped their viewer’s minds clean on a daily basis. DNC cannot grok this. They depend on corporate news sewers to portray them, and as always they get stabbed in the back by both-sidesing republiQan-owned shit factories. That world of The West Wing where honest media affected voters has been gone for decades, it would sure be a good idea for the DNC to wake up to that fact.

This “Better Jobs” view was always a corporatist Dem position that was doomed to fail, and often did.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Oh, the neolibs are fighting the good fight are they?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I don't know what the fuck a neolib is. Do they have hats?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Free trade’s just a dandy concept/Advertisers tell us so/Don’t you question, don’t you doubt it/You’re so stupid. You don’t know.” So goes a song Sherrod Brown composed on his guitar back in 1993

Democrats' messaging remains consistent to this day.

Democrats’ leftward lurch on economic policy

Consisted of telling people who were suffering to be happy that billionaires were doing so well.

Even in 2024, Mr Brown felt he weathered attacks over transgender athletes and illegal immigration. “The ad that beat us,” Mr Brown says, was one that declared a vote for Mr Brown to be a vote against Mr Trump. “There was no really good answer for that,” he says.

The answer Democrats settled on has been to abandon trans people rather than embrace workers.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

"wandered"

More like shit in their faces and then sprinted away at top speed.

[-] satanmat@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Sigh. Paywall

http://archive.today/xU2Ik

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

It was Sharrod Brown losing that made me realize I didn't belong in Ohio anymore.

[-] sprack@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

“The ad that beat us,” Mr Brown says, was one that declared a vote for Mr Brown to be a vote against Mr Trump. “There was no really good answer for that,” he says.

It basically comes down to race for those voters.

this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024

62 points (77.2% liked)

politics

19271 readers

1612 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News