732
Senses (slrpnk.net)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 2 days ago

Remember kids that you don't feel matter; you feel the electrostatic repulsion of electrons that occupy part of the 99+% of empty space of each atom is composed of. The vibrational frequency of those atoms create heat that radiates through that void to be detected by other atoms as more or less heat energy. Over 99% of you is empty space and radiant energy, which means that mathematically you barely even exist.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 67 points 4 days ago

More nerds need to get into philosophy. Specifically CS nerds. I think there’s a tendency, when you get into programming, to start seeing the world in terms of discrete, quantifiable units and categorical rules. It’s a helpful counterbalance to also study something that uses logic to deconstruct that kind of objective physicalist assumption.

[-] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

Counterpoint, we get enough of that shit from people writing our design specs, and then give feedback like "it needs to pop more" or "this is good, but we need it to feel more modern".

So, discrete, quantifiable things make for an easier deliverable, thanks.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 19 points 4 days ago

There’s a quote that I’m having trouble sourcing, but it’s basically:

Code is for humans to read, and only incidentally for computers to execute.

I think a lot of things are like that, especially when it comes to defining and organizing work. It’s less about making the perfect requirements document and more about getting everyone to think about a shared goal in a similar way.

Specifics are great because they make for solid landmarks. But abstract language is essential too, because it clues you into how you ought to navigate the terrain in between those landmarks.

And there is always space in between the specifics. If you managed to nail down every last detail in your spec, congratulations on your new hand-compiled programming language.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I believe individuals choose the worldview that comforts/benefits one the most, and that is why programmers often think in discrete units. It helps them identify issues and handle them well. Is there a reason to introduce discomfort, when the worldview works quite well?

[-] ZOSTED@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Also so much of how we talk about CS/software dev is cribbed directly from, not just real engineering, but also philosophy. Abstraction, concretisation, instantiation, etc.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 4 days ago

"Because you have to wonder: how do the machines know what Tasty Wheat tasted like? Maybe they got it wrong. Maybe what I think Tasty Wheat tasted like actually tasted like oatmeal, or tuna fish. That makes you wonder about a lot of things. You take chicken, for example: maybe they couldn't figure out what to make chicken taste like, which is why chicken tastes like everything."

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

It's a single-celled protein combined with synthetic aminos, vitamins and minerals. Everything the body needs.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

For the unaware, this is a Quote from The Matrix, in which the character muses about how the fake reality which is the matrix might be inconsistent with actual reality but the people would never know the difference. He then goes on to explain that, to him, the steak is delicious, so he does not care.

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

I think you're confusing Mouse and Cypher..?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We do know how things taste, sound, look, smell, feel, etc because those are all subjective concepts of perception. Without us, the physical phenomena we sense don’t do any of those things.

[-] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 47 points 4 days ago

nothing is real do what you want

That is a fallacious conclusion from this observation. Don't use this philosophy as an excuse to act like an asshole.

While everyone perceives reality slightly differently, apples do have a specific light absorption and reflection spectrum.

Our limited perception of it doesn't make it "not real". Same is true for other senses as well.

load more comments (7 replies)

How does the addition of just one proton change the material's characteristics SO much??

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

To make it even crazier while we think of color blindness as a binary thing, it's really (like most things) a spectrum.

Everyone has a slightly different ratio of cones. And some have a different amount of cones than others. Then there's the ratio of the different comes to rods.

Take any two random people and they'll likely agree what name a color is, but they both experience that color slightly differently.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 17 points 4 days ago

Shrimp have multiple color recptors because their brains are too primitive/rudimentary to combine input from more than a single receptor into a composite color. The result is that 12 colors (or however many receptors it is) is the total number of colors they can see.

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 days ago

nothing is real do what you want

This is what they take away from it? Discussing qualia is fascinating, and natural philosophy of the mind in general is an amazing field, but if your takeaway is that nothing exists, your understanding is about as deep as a puddle

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

What colors can mantis shrimp even see? Having 16 different cones doesn't mean anything if they're all slightly different variations of green, for example.

Edit: Okay, they can see more colors that us. They can see 300 nm to 720 nm and we can see 400 nm to 700 nm.

[-] mhague@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

I think your question was spot on. They have more cones but they seem worse. They also lack our ability to process the stimuli into a rich tapestry of color.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24458639/

Not sure if there's more current info though.

load more comments (1 replies)

Well yeah, that thought is important. While apples do have an objective color in the sense that physics teaches us that electromagnetic radiation with a certain frequency is more or less likely to be absorbed/reflected, we can only perceive a subjective color.

I personally define reality as any measurement that a machine (computer or robot) can take. As such, there is an objective reality. But also, most people mostly act on emotion and not based on real data.

But also, this isn't a meme. It belongs in the philosophy or science memes community.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I personally define reality as any measurement that a machine (computer or robot) can take. As such, there is an objective reality.

Is there? How do you determine whether the machine doing the measurements is real?

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The face punch method, (not a personal attack just a rather crude if effective philisophical tool) aka if I repeatedly punch you in the face you have a hard time continuing to argue that my fist is not real, or at the very least real enough for practical purposes. Personal involvment makes the situation a lot less abstract.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Oh, I never argued that fist are not a good way to determine reality, but calling your fist a machine is cringe.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Technically the person being punched is the machine in this situation, the fist is the thing being measured.

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 4 points 3 days ago

Now think about the fact that we lock people up based on eyewitness testimony....

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Funny – just this week I ran into the concept of Solipsism for the first time in my life, and now this post.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I sincerely doubt you ran into anything given that you don't exist.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

😆🫵👏🤝

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
732 points (96.8% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4070 readers
9 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Image descriptions and plain text captions of written content are expected of all screenshots. Here are some image text extractors (I looked these up quick and will gladly take FOSS recommendations):

-web

-iOS

-android

Please begin copied raw text posts (lacking a screenshot that makes it apparent it is from Tumblr) with:

# This has been reposted here to Lemmy as part of the "Curated Tumblr Project."

I made the icon using multiple creative commons svg resources, the banner is this.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS