58
submitted 4 days ago by streetfestival@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

"Now"...

Pretty sure Operation Beaver Drop was in the 70s. We've known that the increased water retention not only acts as a natural fire barrier, but it's incredibly beneficial to local biodiversity.

It's just that not only is there no money to be made in the process, wetlands can't really be used for anything that produces money.

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Have shit not burn down doesn't make money, but it stops losing money.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

But the tax payers will have to pay to fix the burnt stuff so why should some oligarch care? They have money to make today if they clear cut the forest and drain the wetlands. The future generations can deal with the consequences.

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
58 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7287 readers
328 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS