847
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

Dr. Oz is a charlatan who's allowed to exist because the vitamin and supplement industry lobbied against FDA oversight and won.

He's the literal product of corruption.

And Snakeoil

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

America Last. WTF, the Government of Putin wants an epidemic to break out. How many people in the red run welfare counties would be affected by Dr. Oz's plan? Indeed, a shit ton and they voted for it.

[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I'll make it much simpler to understand. The only thing putin wants. Is America out of the way. Whatever form that takes. So that he can pursue his plans in Eurasia.

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago

He really has talent in choosing all his picks. "Ummm who could be the worst person ever to fill this role?"

[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 days ago

Every one of those terrible picks has been a deliberate, careful choice to destabilize the country.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

Except the NASA guy. He's probably pretty good. But his job is to funnel contracts (and therfore billions of dollars) to spacex.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Anyone decent will be fired for not doing terrible things or quit because there's too much pressure to do the terrible things (cf Trump's first term). Most of them are happy to do the terrible things this go round, though, because they were identified in advance for being willing to do the terrible things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 days ago

Being serious, it seems like he picked his people from a couple of pools.

  1. Republicans with a lot of social media clout.
  2. People plausibly accused of being Russian agents.

Don't forget name-recognition (even outside the social media spheres.) When's the last time so many cabinet picks were names the average American already knew? It's not like we're the most informed group of people. Yet out of all the millions of people in the United States, what are the chances that the best people for these jobs are ones the public has already heard of?

Trump has gotten as far as he has by treating his own name like a brand. It's not surprising that he prefers to associate with others who've done the same.

[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Oz went on to explain that most people have misread the Constitution and Bill of rights, people can have life OR liberty OR the pursuit of happiness. Only the rich will get all three...

[-] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

It's an interesting perspective on a phrase that literally says "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness".

[-] Juice@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

Funny because you can only pursue liberty or pursue happiness when dead. Almost like the afterlife, religion is an instrument of class oppression

[-] CaptainCancel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

FFS, this guy thinks it’s a prix fixe menu!

[-] lazylion_ca@lemmynsfw.com 168 points 3 days ago

Even the people who pay for insurance don't have rights either.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They do in other modern countries. Oh wait, except they don't have "uninsured" people. If your government can't guarantee you basic things like clean air and water, protection, health... what the fuck are you paying taxes for!?

[-] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

More lanes for more roads, because more lanes will definitely fix gridlock

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 days ago

what the fuck are you paying taxes for!?

dead brown kids!

[-] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago

Dont forget the billionaires!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago

Just think: you all did the right thing, holding your nose at the polls, voting for Fetterman to block Oz. And now you have both of them.

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Brain damage causes conservatism.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Nah, I probably have some decent brain damage and am solidly progressive.

[-] 4grams@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Same here. My brain injury made me even more radical. If anything has me wondering if I’ve gone paranoid and insane seeing all this coming danger while the rest of the world just goes about their business.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 2 days ago

Lol ah the American Dream.

[-] pachrist@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Life, uh, finds a way...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 73 points 2 days ago
[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago

Single payer healthcare is so complex to implement that only 22 of the 23 most developed countries in the world have done it.

The US system is grotesque.

[-] bigschnitz@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Part of the problem for the US is that such a huge amount of gdp is buried in the masses of beauracracy that makes up the US healthcare system, it's essentially acting (economically) as proxy government spending to prop up a failing economy. The average US citizen is so heavily propaganda'd into hating government run projects that the sensible economic stimulus (government infrastructure projects or public services) are well and truly off the table.

What this ultimately means is fixing healthcare isn't just breaking up the cartels, preventing price fixing and untangling the web of nonsense that makes up the US private system... unless you want to inspire a massive crash (which absolutely has real human cost), it also means redistributing government spending and implementing (unrelated) government run services and/or projects to keep all these people employed (which would also mean re-training and potentially relocating) - all of which needs to be done against the overwhelmingly loud voices screeching "government employee bad".

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

While I agree with the sentiment (where this should be the case), this isn't actually true for some of these countries.

Australia, for example, though not sure if we're included in this 23, we have a private system also.

For all emergency care, it's single-payer. Private health insurance / private hospitals are not permitted to provide emergency care, nor out of hospital car, but all other hospital care is allowed (I am simplifying, as I'm not super clear on it either). Further, private health insurance is not allowed to cover things that Medicare doesn't at least also partially cover.

Sounds good right? Sounds like private health is kept in check? I mean, sort of, but it's still really profitable, and you even get a tax break.

What it doesn't stop, is prices getting higher and you having to cover the difference because health care employees are not necessarily employed by the stat, and can set their own prices (which is either covered by private insurance in hospital, or out-of-pocket outside hospital as private can't cover that).

If you don't have private health, you often have to wait way longer in the public system for non-emergency (but still medically necessary) care, like hip replacements, eye surgery etc.

It's kinda fucked, everyone ought to be in the same queue, and if things are taking too long well then gee, I dunno, pay more / hire more / train more doctors, this doesn't take a genius to figure out.

Healthcare should be provided by the state, in-full, covered by taxes. We (and the US for that matter) have plenty of tax revenue to cover this. And if you're feeling really frisky, perhaps very slightly increase corporate taxes and tax breaks for the wealthy.

So we now have a two tiered system, where the wealthy get care first, or whoever can afford to pay. And you even get a tax break for it.

The US system is trash, and ours is utopian by comparison, but let's not pretend like all 22 of 23 countries have true, universal healthcare.

We don't, let's aim higher haha

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

The US system is state sanctioned terrorism of the civilian population by the plutocracy, for profit.

[-] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 82 points 3 days ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 82 points 3 days ago

Just wish the US would get a universal healthcare system like every freaking other developed country in this world. Will never happen. Ugh.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 51 points 3 days ago

Nah, the Republicans would rather see you spend twice as much per capita (the whole population!) to cover a third of the population via public insurance and then get you guys to then spend money on private insurance and then have to pay any time you need any care.

You know... Fiscal responsibility...

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 89 points 3 days ago

If everyone just said fuck it and stopped paying their insurance, it would crash not just those companies, but domino into taking out the entire stock market.

Like, these companies are worth so much, and they invest in others and people invest in them. If their entire revenue stream is stopped at once that's it.

Which makes it kind of a nuclear option, one I've intentionally not mentioned and haven't seen anyone else either.

But the day may be coming

load more comments (53 replies)
[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 31 points 2 days ago
[-] ramsorge@discuss.online 55 points 3 days ago

Ha ha ha. Pop pop pop.

When the denying starts, the deposing starts.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 3 days ago

"Those who make peaceful reform impossible make violent revolution inevitable."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

What a piece of shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
847 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19271 readers
1611 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS