869
WITNESS ME (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yuki2501@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Reminds me of Raven from Snow Crash, except his bike was carrying a nuke 💀

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 42 points 4 days ago

Should bikes be covered in explosive reactive armor?

Some sources say yes.

[-] HearTwoTalk@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

How noncredible of you

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago

Ah Mutually Assured Destruction, if it works for the world’s superpowers it should work for us cyclists.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 59 points 4 days ago

would be funny to have some cyclist war boys in mad max

[-] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 43 points 4 days ago

Now I'm imagining these scrawny ass war boys with calves the size of grapefruits from cycling on sand all day

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 25 points 4 days ago

I'm sure there would be one standout dude on a post-apocalyptic penny farthing that spews fire and the big wheel is just a giant saw blade.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Yes please. I just watched Furiosa last night for the first time and I loved it so much. Even if you don't like the story the stunt work is nuts!

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I like the idea. I think I'll tie some pressure-activated mines to myself next time I go for a walk in a high-traffic area.

My safety is backed by nuclear weapons.

-Mahatma Gandhi

[-] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Pretty sure the car would absorb the shrapnel far better than your neon spandex though

[-] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 4 days ago

bosnian ape society moment

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I miss their older videos.

[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

I'm not insinuating anything, but u-locks fit pretty well in the hand, and side mirrors are pretty flimsy.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 53 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Please don't start a fight with an aggressive driver. For your sake. They may be in the wrong, they may be breaking the law, they may be assholes, but you could very easily lose your life. Vehicle vs person/cyclist: vehicle will win the physical fight, with 4+ thousand lbs of force. No amount of court-ordered money to your family after you're gone is worth that. Use a camera and report drivers, safely, after the fact.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

We really need to pass laws that allow individual cyclists to collect bounties on drivers that violate safety laws.

Police are generally pretty ineffective at actually enforcing laws meant to protect cyclists. Most states have laws relating to minimum passing distance, laws that allow cyclist to take the whole lane, etc. But these laws mean little because cops don't really enforce them for cultural and practical reasons. First, cops are extremely classist. They tend to assume cyclists are poor. And thus they really don't see them as fully human, so they don't really care about protecting them. It's common for drivers to not even get a ticket when they murder a cyclist with their vehicle. Second, there are practical difficulties of enforcing these laws. Cops can't realistically just sit at a location, waiting until a driver happens to violate some bicycle safety law. If police were to attempt to enforce safe passing distance laws, they would have to actually get on a bicycle themselves while in plain clothes and just wait until drivers violated their safety. But most cops would take riding a bike as an insult to their manhood, and they are generally pretty fat and lazy. Biking isn't really their cup of tea. For cultural and practical reasons, police are generally very poor at enforcing bicycle safety laws.

I think the solution is to allow individual cyclists to enforce the safety laws themselves. It isn't hard or expensive to equip a bicycle and helmet with a handful of very decent cameras. Are you following the law, occupying the lane, when an angry driver in a giant pickup truck comes up right behind you and starts tailgating you and wailing on their horn? They are likely violating the law. They are violating all sorts of rules about aggressive driving, unsafe following, etc. By doing this, they are putting your life at risk. As such, I see no reason why you shouldn't be able to sue them in court for damages. Pass a cyclist within the 3 foot minimum passing distance? They should be able to take you to small claims court for $200. Aggressive tail gating and honking? $500. "Rolling coal" into a group of cyclists? $1000 per cyclist violated. Deliberately run a cyclist off the road? They now own your car. In many cities, some people could probably make their whole living just biking around and collecting fines from asshole drivers.

Cars have license plates on them. In a court case, it is not hard to find who owns a vehicle. And cyclists can easily equip their helmets and bikes that will clearly record the license plate and face of any aggressive driver that violates safety laws. So you can pretty easily find the specific individual that was threatening your safety.

I really think this is the most effective thing we could do to increase cyclist safety in the US. The unique risks cyclists face from drivers just aren't the kind of violations that traffic cops are effective at dealing with. And enforcing laws like minimum passing distance really aren't something that needs the full services of an armed officer to get involved in. Instead, these rules could be enforced through simple civil action. Let cyclists who have had their safety violated directly sue the drivers who violated their safety. No need to carry a weapon and fight it out on the streets. Instead, let them go before a judge and try to justify their ridiculous behavior to them. If small claims court proves inappropriate for this, we could also up the fines a bit and let cyclists also collect attorneys fees. An attorney could specialize in just this type of case, get really good at winning them, and then take the cases on contingency. They could even put up billboards saying, "make sure to have these types of cameras to most effectively capture evidence..."

If we can have bounties on people for using the 'wrong' bathroom, I see no reason we can't do the same thing for cyclists and ignorant aggressive drivers.

[-] yonder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Best thing to do right now is to file traffic complaints with the local police.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

File one of those, and it goes straight to the trash bin.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Naich@lemmings.world 9 points 4 days ago

Knowing that the driver won't get away with it greatly helps in keeping your cool when you encounter an arsehole. It also stops you being an arsehole back because it would weaken your case against them. This only works if the police will do something, but luckily they do here.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 4 days ago

My lawyer told me I shouldn't smash up cars that are parked in the bike lane.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Unscrew the valve stem cap on a tire. Place a bb in the cap and put the cap back on. Escalation needs to start at the bottom.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

Sorry, but almost always nothing would happen.

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

New approach: we strap a demon core to our bicycles 😁

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Hmmm... Forcefully pushing them together might actually cause a little explosion. Not sure. But you also need the neutron reflectors. All in all I rate this defense a 5/10 because of how rare and special it is, but also not higher because we are talking about like 50 kg worth of stuff.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago
[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Yes. But not like a massive explosion. Worst case is a fireball. These things are really though for obvious reasons. If the impact is THAT violent you are dead before the gas has time to ignite. The car is not going to care much about a few seconds of additional fire.

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Agree, at the speed where this ploy starts working is around the part where you stop being a human and start being physics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago

Now that's a clean-burning mutually assured destruction I tell you what.

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 7 points 4 days ago

I've heard of a pyrrhic victory but Jesus.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 4 days ago

Mutually Assured Destruction works for preventing the use of nukes, surely it can work for cars being more careful of pedestrians and bicyclists.

[-] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 days ago

What I find interesting about this comment is that despite living in a fairly dense area, I don't hear these complaints from pedestrians. Not that there aren't deaths, to be clear, it's just that with pedestrians I hear "slower speeds", "traffic calming", "better visibility".

From bicyclists I hear "fuck, you want me to put a light on my bike? why don't you put a light on your car motherfucker?" (Actual lemmy thread from 1-2 months ago, paraphrased to represent the actual vitriol involved).

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 3 days ago

I'm sure there are some super elitist joggers that have those same thoughts somewhere. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[-] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 days ago

Ok facts 😆

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Sooo... does anyone know what pannier that guy is rocking? I love that style of "hold anything" sling pannier.

Edit: The closest thing I can find is the Surly Big Dummy Bag

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ShaggyBlarney@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

That's the spirit!

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Hmm, now I kinda want to see a propane powered motor bike.

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Lmao, or a propane generator on the back of an e bike charging a spare battery

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
869 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9870 readers
683 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS