711
submitted 2 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Pulitzer-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes resigned from The Washington Post after the paper refused to publish her cartoon depicting owner Jeff Bezos and other media leaders kneeling before Donald Trump.

Telnaes criticized the decision as censorship, calling it dangerous for press freedom.

The Post's opinions editor, David Shipley, defended the move, citing redundancy with other content.

Telnaes’s resignation follows backlash over the Post’s recent editorial decisions, including avoiding endorsements for Kamala Harris, which led to mass subscription cancellations.

Telnaes has long been celebrated for her bold commentary and award-winning work.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 264 points 2 days ago
[-] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Is this the original or did you create it?

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 101 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] ratel@mander.xyz 30 points 2 days ago

Yeah it says in the link it's a rough draft of the cartoon that got rejected which is probably why it looks a bit shopped.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

I think, from top down - Altman, besos, zuckerberg, ???, and mickey (did iger donate?).

Who is the bottom person though? Doesn't look like him, but the Apple guy gave his protection money as well. And did Google bend the knee as well?

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Okay, it was the LAtimes owner that also refused to endorse in editorial.

"The group in the cartoon included Mark Zuckerberg/Facebook & Meta founder and CEO, Sam Altman/AI CEO, Patrick Soon-Shiong/LA Times publisher, the Walt Disney Company/ABC News, and Jeff Bezos/Washington Post owner."

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago

Mickey is a reference to ABC, which is owned by Disney, cowing to Trump.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Tim Cook just recently donated, so maybe him? Or even if not, worth the mention

Edit: oops it’s late and I missed “Apple guy” or “tim Apple” as trumps 5yo brain can remember

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Oof that's a good one too.

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

MVP thanks x

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Media being owned by a few rich people was and always has been dangerous for press freedom.

I can only really see workers co-ops striking the correct balance here. (Basically, editor makes decisions, when needed workers vote on whether to publish or not).

Capitalism is always the problem, and anti-democratic.

[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 68 points 2 days ago
[-] Jomega@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago

Voltaire never said that. He lived under a monarchy, so it wouldn't have made sense if he did. That quote was made up by a neo nazi and falsely attributed to him.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

And it's completely bullshit, just phrased so people think it's "old timey", it's always been an issue but more so since social media. People just believe anything with a Historical figure's name at the end.

-William Shakespeare

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

I like big butts and I cannot lie

-George Washington

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago

That was benjamin franklin

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

DJ Benji Frank

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder

-Sir Mix-A-Lot

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

I fuck with that

-Oscar Wilde

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Shakespeare predicted social media? He truly was a visionary.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Still a good message though

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That depends on how you define "not allowed to criticise".

To the neo-Nazis who invented and popularized the phrase, it means "People calling me an asshole when I say bigoted shit." They use it as part of their constant refrain that they're being "censored" by people who refuse to give them a platform to spew their poison.

It is a good message, but one that can easily be twisted into something very dangerous if you're not careful.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

Interesting. I wasn't familiar with the backstory, thanks!

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 2 days ago

Most truths are double edged, if not multiple edged, like throwing stars.

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee -5 points 2 days ago

Gets so fucking old that there is always someone who will go out of their way to drag conversations down into negativity and mansplainingly remind everyone there's some fucking reason we should have a problem with something even though right here in the immediate it's hurting nobody. Just endless fucking vitriol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth -1 points 2 days ago
[-] Jomega@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Not really. You just interpreted it in a less shitty way than intended.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 days ago

Some people see a half empty glass, others a half full glass. It's a half glassed either way.

[-] Godort@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago

We must rise up against children with terminal illnesses.

[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I, for one, welcome our terminally ill child overlords.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Jonathan Swift has entered the chat

[-] criticon@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

-Michael Scott

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 37 points 2 days ago

I wonder if the Post will elevate another, more pliant, cartoonist to take her place and draw about the news whilst careful to not skewer the powerful, or instead decide that this is about Innovation, and from now on, cartoons will be AI-generated?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Oh god, I could totally see them switching to AI cartoons. Bezos can write the prompts himself.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

“My decision was guided by the fact that we had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon and had already scheduled another column – this one a satire – for publication.”

It’s hard to make an argument that they are protecting Bezos if they already had 2 other articles criticizing him. But then why not just delay the cartoon?

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Trump would never read the articles. But he would see the cartoon.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

He'd have to have someone explain it to him though.

[-] nomy@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

explain it to him

That's not usually how he operates.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Exactly, delay it a few days if it's "too similar". Cop out answer.

[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

The comment was super weasely. "On the same topic" could mean anything. Based on what he says, the articles don't need to mention Bezos at all.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Editorial independence!

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Not surprised they refused.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
711 points (99.7% liked)

News

23761 readers
3201 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS