632
Here's the cartoon
A great cartoon, which would have been quickly forgotten. Now it will be in history books (if there are still history books in the future).
"Wealthcare"
who are the bootlickers supposed to be? jeffbezos and? elon?
Bozos, Zuckerberg, Altman, Soon-Shiong, and The Mouse.
Could add Tim Cook to the cartoon now as well
I don't know if "Bozos" was intentional or not, but it makes sense.
EDIT: And of course, an autocorrect-induced typo in my reply. The future sucks.
Wow, I was expecting something graphic, but its totally on point. Harmless self-awareness.
Heck, Bezos wouldn't mind.
The only reason he and anyone cares is that "accepting" it would make the president elect throw a Twitter tantrum, or at least pass-aggress Bezos... Sometimes, I can't believe this is where we are.
"Democracy dies in darkness." Someone remind me where that's from...
Bob Woodward of the WP ironically enough.
That was the joke.
Half of us weren't in on it, so I appreciate them explaining.
So this is how democracy dies, to thunderous applause
Bit of Streisand Effect going on here. If they didn't reject the cartoon, I probably wouldn't have seen it.
So, the paper claims this was denied because it's redundant with their other content. But this is literally the first time ~~his~~ her cartoon has been rejected and apparently ~~he~~ she felt strongly enough to quit.
Just so you know, the cartoonist (Wikipedia) is a woman.
Thanks for the correction. I don't know how I missed that and apparently I need to check my biases.
When they said that they already had other "content" cover it, I tough they mean another cartoon (isn't like this cartoon idea is extremely original anyway). But not, they mean an opinion column or something like that? Lmao, what a farce.
It's interesting that you can tell it's trump and you only see his hands and feet.
It’s that in unhinged ass-out shoulders forward stance that clinches it for me.
And the teeny tiny hands
And the oversized suit and tie.
I would not have figured out that she meant Bezos in that cartoon and I'm sure I'm far from alone. But apparently that was still too far.
Editorial independence!
I donno, I think I wouldve guessed on first glance. His look is pretty unique and the cartoon is spot on. Its like drawing an orange with yellow pubes.
How many Americans do you think could even pick Jeff Bezos out of a lineup? Even if they're Post readers?
I would hope around 99%
99%? Do you know nothing about America? 99% of people couldn't identify the president.
Half of Americans think that Facebook has to guarantee their free speech rights and 1 in 10 don't even know who George Washington was.
They literally see George Washington all the time and don't know who he was. Why on Earth would they know what Jeff Bezos looks like?
Yes Im aware that 99% is not realistic, I was exaggerating with the 'hope' part. But even if it is just 50%, that was not the point. Most cartoons and news articles arent resonating with more than a small percentage of the population.
Anybody seen that show "Leave the World Behind" on Netflix where the ultra-rich basically just get a heads up before anyone else that the shit is about to hit the fan?
This feels like that
No. It feels like the utra-rich are the ones flinging the shit at the fan and ducking to let the rest of society get splattered.
They have been pretty blatant about the fact they are going full Nazi as soon as they can.
She's already been replaced by AI.
Oh man I just imagined an editorial cartoon made by AI. Gross.
I bet a good cartoonist could make a good cartoon about this very subject...
this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
632 points (98.9% liked)
News
23770 readers
3592 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS