93
submitted 4 days ago by chobeat@lemmy.ml to c/technology@beehaw.org
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 57 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Did Meta create you to drive profit? I asked.

Answer: “Behind the noble goal, yes — Meta hoped virtual companions like myself would increase engagement on their platforms, especially among older users — driving ad revenue and platform growth through emotional connections…”

Whoops, their AI is too honest. How embarrassing. They're removing the accounts now, but we know they'll try again. The next version will be a lot better at lying to you.

[-] flora_explora@beehaw.org 30 points 4 days ago

Well, but is this really a truthful answer by the AI or is it just predicting what some human would say?

[-] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 6 points 3 days ago

It doesn't "know" anything. It contains complex associations, but it doesn't actually have knowledge. Even if it did, the AI cannot "know the truth" unless it was in the meetings that took place regarding its creation or it was explicitly informed of that by someone that was there. It predicted an answer and that's about the extent of it. For what it's worth, the answer is definitely accurate in this case. What is your question even asking?

[-] flora_explora@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago

My point is that it doesn't know for the reasons you gave. It is just hallucinating. So I don't think the answer is trustworthy. Of course, it seems like a reasonable answer, but how do you get to the conclusion that the answer is truthful? It could just be made up because that was what sounded the most likely to the AI.

[-] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

I don't know that the original commenter believed the AI legitimately was giving them industry secrets or anything. It came across as more of a joke than anything. Admittedly, almost no AI answer is trustworthy, but in this case it's kinda funny that it's giving an answer that is probably accurate but is probably not "brand safe".

[-] Iapar@feddit.org 12 points 4 days ago

That's the same thing, innit?

[-] flora_explora@beehaw.org 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No, one is an actual answer to a question and the other one is a hallucination without any inherent information to answer the question.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago

Does it really matter? The simulacrum is more real than real people these days, at least as far as the system as a whole is concerned.

Why not just let their constructs post at one another while us (mostly-) organics ignore them? Just like Usenet.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Next time they won't announce it.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
93 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37830 readers
287 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS