423
Marjorie Taylor Greene may not run for reelection
(www.newsweek.com)
Don’t tempt me with a good time.
I think it goes further than that: she is threatening us with a good time.
She thinks she’s going to get the VP nod from Trump. As usual, she’s fucking delusional.
Or she's under investigation for January 6th, I can hope.
Por que no los dos?
...or something like that. My spanish sucks.
It's correct, just need ¿ at the beginning for optimal pedantry.
And some accent marks + tildas
Do an umlaut.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I can see the bumper stickers now: "dumb and dumber 2024"
But how will anyone know which is which?
load more comments
(3 replies)
I thought Sarah Palin was extreme. Greene makes her look like a Democrat.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It’s like nobody ready the article. It says she’s considering challenging Kemp in a primary for Georgia Governor because he’s not defending Trump.
Edit: apparently I can read better - she wants to run against Kemp in the primary when he runs for Senate, not Governor.
What a crappy headline... Poorly executed click-bait that misinforms more than it informs.
But Kemp's serving his second term as Governor. He can't run again unless he waits 4 years after he's out of office. Which will be in 2026. EmptyG would have a whole another term as a congresswoman before we vote on the governor
I also didn't read the article, but are you sure that's what it said?
Ah, I slightly misread - she wants to run against him in the primary when he runs for Senate. I’ll edit my comment. Thanks for pointing that out.
It's all good. I think the bot kind of messed up the summary too.
If he does run for senate, I'll do my best to keep him out. We've got two great senators right now, I don't think he can beat either one. But who knows, it's all going to come down to messaging.
Bro I can tell you rn lady that being Trumps running mate wont end well.
I don't think I've ever seen a double entendre for Gallows humor, but here we are.
Remember when MTG stood for Magic: The Gathering? I 'member.
Well, if she's no longer elected, then it can still be.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Clickbait title much? It's because she's considering a Senate run or being Trump's VP.
~~The summary bot has Georgia governor (primary anyway).~~ apparently wrong.
Goddamn I hope she runs for gov.
Kemp is term-limited. He has to sit out from the office for the next term before he can run again, which means he'll probably seek some other office in the meantime. And whatever he runs for he's almost certain to get.
People talk about GA being a swing state, but it fucking isn't. MAGA doesn't do great statewide, but the GOP has near total control with little contest.
MTG on the ticket is EXACTLY what the GA Dems need to make some serious inroads in statewide elections.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That's a misread of the article/summary. It's saying that Kemp (the current GA governor) is talking about a Senate run and MTG would challenge him in a primary for the GOP Senate nomination.
load more comments
(1 replies)
If she goes the VP route, hopefully she ends up a political nobody like that dink from alaska
Because pence wasn't bad enough, now the dumb and dumber goblin needs a go.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
This woman deserves to be indicted for her participation in Jan 6.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Did her state introduce a literacy test she can't pass?
Or will she refuse because reading all those erotic stories would be a sin.
IE: she's been offered a high-paying job fucking something else up in the private sector, probably to as much of the detriment of the human race as scientifically possible.
She literally thinks she's going to be VP...
I don't even think Republicans are stupid enough to entertain that notion, but I've been sadly wrong before when estimating the stupidity of the GOP.
Trump is likely to pick the most horrible person possible, so I assume that she is a contender.
The headline made me think this was going to be good news.
Hopefully she goes away forever
It’s a clickbate headline. She’s considering running for a higher office.
She won't. Trump said we'd never hear from again if he lost the election. They crave the spotlight.
She's eyeing the vp for Trump
Yeah, but the reason is even worse. She thinks she's going to be VP! AAAAAHHHHHHH!
It would make me pine for someone smart and competent like Dan Quayle
God. Remember when misspelling potato fucked up your chance of political office?
Good times (only sorta).
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
Time to cash in
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Flamethrowing GOP representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has suggested she might not defend her seat in Congress next fall after two commanding victories in Georgia's 14th District.
Following comments by Georgia Governor Brian Kemp—who is reportedly weighing a run for the U.S. Senate in 2026—criticizing recent, disproven assertions by Donald Trump that he won the battleground state in 2020, Greene said she might be willing to challenge Kemp in a GOP primary.
Assuming, of course, Trump doesn't decide to name her as his running mate after winning the Republican presidential nomination.
After publicly breaking with the far-right Freedom Caucus early this year to support the election of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, with Trump's endorsement, Greene has been in lockstep with the former president.
In addition to Greene, Republicans like New York Representative Elise Stefanik and unsuccessful Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake are seen as top contenders along with Florida Representative Byron Donalds, another close Trump ally and a rising GOP star in the House.
Other possible names include South Carolina Senator Tim Scott, a 2024 presidential candidate who has been largely left unscathed by Trump's withering attacks on his GOP competitors on the campaign trail.
I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Makes sense, while she's here, who's running hell?
load more comments
(3 replies)
Trunt.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
423 points (89.5% liked)
politics
19254 readers
3019 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS