[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

I've heard there are hyper-reflective stickers you can put on/near the plate that basically blind a traffic camera's view when trying to read it

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 weeks ago

Paywalled article

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

I'd also consider myself pretty tech-savvy, but that came from plenty of mistakes growing up including putting malware on the family computer at least twice (mostly ads for these "Pokemon MMOs" back in the mid aughts that were too enticing for my kid brain to refuse 😅).

It's very easy for me to forget how much of an outlier my tech experience is among most folks around my age. I had an acquaintance in the first year of college I helped by giving essay advice, and was very surprised to see that the only thing they really knew how to do was basic use of apps on their iPhone. They got a laptop for school, but no computer experience, no keyboard typing experience, and even just the iPhone Settings app was a scary place to be avoided for the most part. To this person, Microsoft Word was a new thing they had to learn on top of everything else. In college. It was also in the South so I don't know if I should be that surprised unfortunately.

Regardless, it was pretty wild to me, but a very real reminder that not everyone has access to the same resources education, and/or experience to draw on.

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

In principle, I get the idea: that you can't have someone else steal something for you and then get off the hook because you weren't the one who stole it. That said, I feel like the laws should be written in a way that precludes someone being charged with both for the same offense, or in a way that delegates the fault such that "taking" and "receiving" add up to the consequences of a single theft charge.

Of course, the US is a Prison State so it's unlikely one wasn't added simply to pad out sentence lengths or leverage plea deals.

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

I got it working on my Linux desktop with minimal issues (was crashing when I loaded into a map, was an easy system configuration fix after troubleshooting... I also use a more DIY distro so there are occasional quirks). I'm sure it will run fine on steam deck, I highly doubt Valve would have put the game out for beta before testing it on their own hardware

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

The lines coming from the label nodes add a lot of unnecessary visual noise. I think it's already pretty clear what's what based on the circles this graph is arranged into.

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 months ago

Technically, steamOS because it's designed to play games and it's what the steam deck uses. That probably won't have many other non-gaming features though, and I've personally never used it. In my experience, you can get most games without a hyper-aggressive anti cheat working on any Linux distro with varying degrees of effort, just a matter of having all the needed libraries installed! The more popular distros like Ubuntu, popOS, Fedora, even Arch (btw) should have a lot of helpful information out there on how to get Lutris or Steam set up.

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

I mean, AI is used in fraud detection pretty often; when it hits a false positive (which happens frequently on a population-level basis), is that not a hallucination of some sort? Obviously LLMs can go off the rails much further because it's readable text, but any machine learning model will occasionally spit out really bad guesses almost any person could have done better with. (To be fair, humans are highly capable of really bad guesses too).

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago

I'm pretty certain the shorts algorithm is kind of "its own thing" in a lot of ways. It's a prime "your mileage may vary" system, and because so many right wing creators upload to it, it's basically a numbers game unless you get lucky with the algorithm when it's first getting a handle on your preferences.

While I don't know this for certain, the only really effective way to get the algorithm to stop showing you something is to literally close the app for a while when it puts one in front of you. Combined with searching up shorts for the stuff you want, I think it's possible but it's really persistent if it thinks it should show you specific kinds of content.

At the end of the day, however, they're machine learning models, and while we can gesture at trends, nobody knows the full ins and outs of how a specific model makes its decisions. Kind of scary that we trust them to the role of curation in the current environment at all to be honest

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago

Is that a Warby Parker glasses cloth?

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago

idk it kind of looks like he hit himself in the head with it pretty good during the fall. It's obscured behind one of the housing posts but you can still kind of see based on how the railing and his head/upper body moves.

[-] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

And you owe back payments from when we paused it!

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Ashelyn

joined 1 year ago