I hope Gimp 3.0 stable will happen before the heat-death of the universe.

1,480 containers are lost on average per year

That's a good point, but this go toward both arguments:

• Salvaging so many containers looks unrealistic,
• A mandate to salvage lost containers would be an incentive to better secure a handle containers, thus decreasing the number of lost containers.

The incredibly high pressure on the ocean's floor would probable make the air bag solution impractical, just as you said. I'm embarrassed for not thinking about this.

The point is to salvage the container's content, not necessarily the container themselves. I suggested bringing the whole things to the surface using air bag hoping it would simplify the operation.

So here's a plan B: Require buoyancy of containers that contains anythings dangerous for the environment (plastic, oil, batteries, ...).

Nobody will go on a costly underwater expedition [..] to recover some soggy Chinese fast fashion

If there's such a mandate, there would be insurance to cover against such cost. The insurance premium might decrease the amount cheap fast fashion that gets shipped around the world.

The cost might be prohibitive for shipping companies, but that's not a reason NOT to have them cleanup the mess they're creating.

Even if you do, you’d need a lot of trips picking up future landfill fodder with a little robot arm

1. Attach salvage air bags to the container
2. Inflate bags using air canisters
3. Recover the container on the surface water

Most sunken containers — some still sealed, some damaged and open — are never found or recovered.

The Coast Guard has limited powers to compel shipowners to retrieve containers unless they threaten a marine sanctuary [..]

That's BS. Where I live, if someone steal my car and drive it into a lake/river, I'll be help responsible for recovering the car, and in practice my car insurance would do it on my behalf.

The shipping company or the container's owner should have similar responsibilities. The average container is a larger risk to the environment than the average car.

Hovering over a checkmark will display a message that explains “Google’s signals suggest that this business is the business that it says it is,” which is determined by things like

I guess this due diligence cost time and money. And doing this due diligence for every ad customer might affect their bottom line.

Try loading this archive from October 2, 2024: Parliamentary Assembly recognises Julian Assange as a ‘political prisoner’ and warns against the chilling effect of his harsh treatment

To check if your Internet service provider is censoring websites, see OONI Probe

Nice Climbing Aloe, bro

Every time a train rumbles to a stop, the energy generated by all that friction is converted to electricity

Friction is how classic braking work, and all the energy that goes into friction is lost. Regenerative braking typically rely on magnets and rotors to slow a train. When a train brake, it uses part of its kinetic energy to spin a rotor, which generate electricity using spinning magnets.

The article is otherwise interesting, it's just unfortunate they got the basic physics wrong.

Reference: Review and trends in regenerative braking energy recovery for traction power system with inverter substation in subway’s of São Paulo city

• You have a malicious actor on your trusted network.
• If so, you have bigger problems.

This is more likely than you think. There's more computers than you realise on the average network. Many aren't updated and have vulnerabilities. If there's one malware on one machine on your network, that means a malicious actor is on your network.

Common exemples :

• Home WiFi network with old unpached router, Android smartphone, network printer, security camera, thermostat, robot vacuum cleaner, smart lightbulb, smart TV, ...
• Unsecure WiFi network at the cafe, train station, hotel, ... where you connect a laptops that is sometimes used for printing and which has CUPS

Sucked the soul out of him

If a car is advertised as smart or connected, there's a good chance it collects too much personal information.

That's too bad because most new cars are, and it may cause some people to keep their old polluting but privacy-friendly car longer.

"Elon took my handle @x and all I got was this loosy t-shirt"