[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 1 points 6 hours ago

I didn't realize the unfortunate collection of atoms referred to as "leon" had a mother. I assumed it coalesced out of the warm santorum between Peter Thiel and JD Vance.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 1 points 6 hours ago

What exactly do you think will happen if Harris is defeated? What evidence do you have for these beliefs?

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

How can you support such moral bankruptcy? How is this any different from Nazi rhetoric in 1938? What do you think when you see the victims- the desperate, crying, amputated, starving, orphaned children?

You speak as if Trump will save the suffering children, why would you think that? And if Kamala doesn't win, we get Trump, not peaceful utopia.

Politics is a horrible game that must be played. Our election has not here presented us with a choice between genocide and peace. We are presented with a choice between one genocide (she hopefully will work to end) vs many simultaneous genocides including against people like myself.

Kamala Harris coming out as against the genocide right now would guarantee her loss and Trump's victory. How does that help anyone?

Trump will not end the genocide of the Palestinian people, he will make it worse and go on to start new genocides. Voting for Kamala Harris doesn't mean you support her every action past and present and all her beliefs, it's merely a strategic choice we as citizens of a democratic republic can make to do what little we can to guide our government in the right direction.

Trump has said he will be very harsh and imprison protesters, if you want to end the genocide of the Palestinian people, how effective will you be from a prison cell?

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 0 points 6 hours ago

I see a comprehension of U.S. political party operations was not installed in your head.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Pointless reply, not all suffering has the same cause of course, but most of the unnecessary suffering (i.e. that suffering of all sentient beings on top that which occurs due to the nature of life itself) is caused by human activity, specifically where selfish individuals have felt entitled to cause suffering in others, destroy ecosystems, extinct species, and oppress peoples in pursuit of their goals.

The world is not ours to consume.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 1 points 7 hours ago

I'm ashamed I fell for her scam in 2016, was in CA though so wasn't worried my vote would directly help the orange waste of baryonic matter.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 1 points 10 hours ago

AI is the greatest accelerant of our species demise.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

If I was given the choice by a genie, on the one side you have your laptop, Lemmy, car, etc, but millions of people an animals suffer, or on the other hand, our tech evolves more slowly and sustainably, I'd choose the latter every time.

I'll take being 30 years behind and still have <insert any species we've driven extinct>. An entitlement to the lives and well being of others for the sake of "progress" is pretty sick.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 6 points 11 hours ago

There is no solution that involves billions of people buying things.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 10 points 11 hours ago

Guarantee that guy is a power bottom that simply cannot accept himself.

view more: next ›

mojo_raisin

joined 1 week ago