111

Late in his team’s game against the Green Bay Packers on September 15, Indianapolis Colts tight end Kylen Granson caught a short pass over the middle of the field, charged forward, and lowered his body to brace for contact. The side of his helmet smacked the face mask of linebacker Quay Walker, and the back of it whacked the ground as Walker wrestled him down. Rising to his feet after the 9-yard gain, Granson tossed the football to an official and returned to the line of scrimmage for the next snap.

Aside from it being his first reception of the 2024 National Football League season, this otherwise ordinary play was only noteworthy because of what Granson was wearing at the time of the hit: a 12-ounce, foam-padded, protective helmet covering called a Guardian Cap.

Already mandatory for most positions at all NFL preseason practices, as well as regular-season and postseason practices with contact, these soft shells received another vote of confidence this year when the league greenlit them for optional game use, citing a roughly 50 percent drop in training camp concussions since their official 2022 debut. Through six weeks of action this fall, only 10 NFL players had actually taken the field with one on, according to a league spokesperson. But the decision was easy for Granson, who tried out his gameday Guardian Cap—itself covered by a 1-ounce pinnie with the Colts logo to simulate the design of the helmet underneath—in preseason games before committing to wear it for real.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 20 hours ago

Would I be way out there to suggest that if you have to go to these lengths to protect a player, maybe it's not a good sport for the 21st century?

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 20 points 17 hours ago

If people want to play it & people enjoy watching it, why discard it rather than make it safer?

I enjoy skydiving, drinking copious amounts of alcohol, & eating fried foods. It’s on me to do those things in moderation.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 hours ago

You aren't practically guaranteed to have life changing injury from skydiving, drinking, or eating. Several studies have shown that over 90% of football players have CTE. It's not the same, and not a question of moderation.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 2 points 9 hours ago

The majority of football players do not have CTE. Could they get it? Yes, that’s why this padding has been invented.

These are grown adults taking measured risks & being paid for it, so others can enjoy it.

Don’t like it? Fine. Don’t watch it. But don’t start winging your judgement around thinking everyone who does like it is lesser than you.

People enjoy competition. People enjoy violence. People enjoy booze. People enjoy drugs. People enjoy fuckin’. Get over it.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago
[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 1 points 11 minutes ago

Oh, I LOVE facts. This is the 3rd paragraph of your first fact:

“The NFL player data should not be interpreted to suggest that 91.7 percent of all current and former NFL players have CTE, as brain bank samples are subject to selection biases. The prevalence of CTE among NFL players is unknown as CTE can only be definitively diagnosed after death. Repetitive head impacts appear to be the chief risk factor for CTE, which is characterized by misfolded tau protein that is unlike changes observed from aging,”

Never said CTE wasn’t a thing, just pointed out that these padded covers are helping protect against it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago

People enjoyed playing and watching jousting. We stopped doing it because it's dangerous and stupid.

Also, drinking copious amounts of alcohol isn't just on you if you have a family.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 16 points 16 hours ago

No, we actually didn't stop doing it. You probably haven't heard of it because fewer people no enjoy watching it.
I watched numerous jousting matches in my life.
What we did stop was pretending it's real combat. Today's jousting matches are more like pro wrestling, where the bruises are real, but the outcome is scripted.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago

People stopped jousting because heads were severed & blood was spilt. I quite enjoy watching the jousting at ren fairs.

Drinking copious amounts of alcohol is not something I invite my family to participate in.

Unless they want to joust. Then I might be swayed.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -5 points 16 hours ago

Heads weren't severed in jousting, what are you talking about? How would that even work? The jousting you're watching in ren fairs is scripted. Also, blood is spilled on football fields all the time.

Also...

Drinking copious amounts of alcohol is not something I invite my family to participate in.

I seriously hope you don't have any kids.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 0 points 15 hours ago

I have 40 children, they’re all drunk now because of you. Just out of spite.

What are you on about? You think those jousters knocked the other jousters off their horses & just started mocking their opponents?

“Hahaha look at the no horse dummy! You lose & I will now abscond with your princess! Hooray I am a jouster!!”

No. They got off their horses & aimed to behead, or otherwise cease the existence of, their opponent.

Yes. Ren Fairs are scripted. So is Wrastlin’ & they spill blood while wrastlin’ too.

What is your point here? You’re above it, so the rest of us are lesser for enjoying it.

People enjoy sport & specifically football. What’s the real problem here? That someone’s subjective opinion differs from yours?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 15 hours ago

That's absolutely not how the sport of jousting worked. You're just making things up. It wasn't gladiatorial combat. And even that resulted in death less often than is usually portrayed.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 0 points 13 hours ago

Well alright expert now I’m shitfaced & ready to learn. Do, please educate us all on aspects of jousting that did not lead to mortal combat.

By your logic, Football isn’t about hurting people any more than jousting is.

Sports are sports. They aren’t going away just because you think you’re better than their fandoms.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

I mean, we literally have medieval rules of jousting.

https://www.medievalists.net/2015/01/medieval-rules-jousting/

Notice no mention of mortal combat being involved in determining a winner. Or being involved at all.

Maybe look these things up before you get shiftaced.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee -1 points 13 hours ago

And here’s the 2024 NFL Rule book. Not a single mention of injuring, hurting, dismembering, beheading, concussions, bruises, broken bones, scabs, cuts, or scrapes. Whatdyaknow?

It’s almost like the rules were written to make the sport safer, much like I’m sure there were for jousting.

Maybe should get shitfaced. Could help you climb down off that high horse.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

What are you even talking about now? This was about your claim that beheading was part of jousting. It wasn't. That's just a lie. I've shown that quite clearly.

But feel free to prove it. You can't because it's a lie.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee -1 points 13 hours ago

I compared the violence & bloodiness of jousting to the violence of football. You claim a they are comparable, I claim they are not.

Maybe I watch too many movies when it comes to jousting, but you’ve done nothing but talk down to football fans because you don’t like the sport.

So which sports do you approve of? Or are all them too demeaning & childish for your tastes?

Jousting, Gladiatorial sport, wrestling, martial arts… see the connection?

People like violence. Just because you don’t doesn’t make them wrong.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

This is what you said:

No. They got off their horses & aimed to behead, or otherwise cease the existence of, their opponent.

It was a lie.

This is also what you said:

Do, please educate us all on aspects of jousting that did not lead to mortal combat.

Which I did and you didn't even acknowledge.

And now you're just trying to ignore the fact that you outright lied.

No. They got off their horses & aimed to behead, or otherwise cease the existence of, their opponent.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

You throw that word “Lie” around with an unfounded authority. Me telling everyone here you’re actually Herschel Walker trying explain why you’re running for office again is a lie.

Me saying that jousting led to beheadings is not a lie. Maybe an overstatement, but not a lie. And furthermore, if you’re such a big fan of jousting, go dig up Henry VIII & lets run some comparisons of his mental state to that of a retired football player.

Once again, I’ll point out that my comment was intended to combat your stance that football was more violent than jousting.

If you’d like to uphold that stance, feel free.

Ok, ok, ok, fine. I’ll admit it. You’ve win this argument. No more football, baseball, basketball, or soccer. Sharpen the hockey sticks, get out the mace, & gas up the fuckin horses.

It’s all medieval sport from here on out America!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Me saying that jousting led to beheadings is not a lie.

That's not what you said.

This is what you said:

No. They got off their horses & aimed to behead, or otherwise cease the existence of, their opponent.

Which they didn't.

Then you said:

Do, please educate us all on aspects of jousting that did not lead to mortal combat.

Which, again, I did. I showed you all the ways to win a joust, none of which involved mortal combat. You won't even acknowledge that you were simply wrong. Some nonsense about digging up Henry VIII won't make you any less wrong that jousting was not about mortal combat.

I mean it would be pretty fucking stupid to kill your own knights, or did that not occur to you?

Ok, ok, ok, fine. I’ll admit it. You’ve win this argument. No more football, baseball, basketball, or soccer. Sharpen the hockey sticks, get out the mace, & gas up the fuckin horses.

Now you're lying about what I'm talking about. Do you just lie all the time?

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 0 points 12 hours ago

What’s with you calling everyone liars? I’m not lying, maybe misinformed on jousting, but you calling me a liar is lying.

I fact, didn’t you report me a whole bunch of times for calling you Richard?

Maybe you should check you civility & stop with the name calling, Richard.

You don’t like football. Am I lying?

You think football is bad dangerous. Am I lying?

You argued football was more dangerous than jousting. Am I lying?

You judge people you disagree with, bait them into arguments in the comment threads, & report them when they react negatively.

AM I STILL LYING?

Nope. I am 100% not lying about any of those statements.

But you’ll refute them nonetheless, because you’re a liar.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago
[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 0 points 11 hours ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

I'm curious if you have sobered up and realized how much you embarrassed yourself last night.

I'm guessing you have and you haven't.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 1 points 9 minutes ago

Not embarrassed in the least. I’m not the one calling for dissolution of an industry I disapprove of.

Have you gotten off your high horse & stopped passing judgement on strangers who disagree with you?

Tequila & toothpaste time!!! Happy Monday.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

I’m not the one calling for dissolution of an industry I disapprove of.

Cool. Neither am I.

I just suggested maybe it wasn't a good idea anymore and pointed to similar bad idea sports we stopped doing because they're dangerous and stupid.

Maybe you didn't notice that what with your telling an absolute whopper about jousting, doubling down on it, and then getting angry when you were shown that you were 100% in the wrong.

And you're still 100% in the wrong, by the way.

Also, if you were serious about drinking tequila first thing in the morning, you have a serious addiction problem and I sincerely hope you get the help you need.

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 19 hours ago

"It is tradition that athletes must be harmed for our entertainment."

I'm not sure that people have moved on all that much from Roman gladiatorial combat.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online -4 points 19 hours ago

Dumb people can’t play chess (well)

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Football is for dumb people, got it

[-] ravhall@discuss.online -1 points 17 hours ago

All that brain damage, proven by countless studies, does make a person dumb.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
111 points (95.1% liked)

News

23190 readers
2879 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS