74
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

How do you figure? He was looking at potentially losing Minnesota, New Hampshire and Virginia when he dropped out, and showing no signs of being able to campaign his way out of that hole. One of the Harris campaign's "gaffes" in the late run was when he went and called Trump supporters garbage (or at least, said words that sounded like that) after the Puerto Rico thing at MSG). Maybe 2020 Biden could have pulled it out, but 2024 Biden, both in the sense of his current mental and social capabilities and in the sense of the baggage he had as the incumbent president, didn't have a lot going for him

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 5 points 4 days ago

Maybe I'm wrong, but I was thinking more in the sense that a lot of people stayed home instead of going out to vote for Harris.

[-] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Fair, I just think jumping to the conclusion that those folks would have come out to vote for Biden is a stretch when you look at how well his campaign was going. Worth remembering that Harris way outperformed Biden in terms of approval rating, which is a very imperfect metric, but the best one we have for guessing if folks would have come out to vote for Biden but stay home for Harris. In 2020, Biden was a challenger to an incumbent who was botching Covid from both a health and economy perspective. In 2024, he was an incumbent struggling to get out of the shadow of the global post-covid recession and some very unpopular decisions in foreign policy regarding the Middle East. Assuming he would have received 2020 levels of votes is not congruent with those facts

[-] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Her entire message was "I'm Biden, for a new generation". "I can't think of single thing I'd do differently", other than put a republican in her cabinet. And with as much time as she spent with her, it was probably going to be a Cheney, cause they've always been so popular with the American electorate...

Biden was nearly net negative 20 favorability when he dropped out, with almost two-thirds of Americans feeling the country was on the wrong track. Incumbents do not win with those numbers, especially ones who can't put together coherent sentences after 8pm.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

There were people googling "did Biden drop out" on election day. His name on the ballot might have been enough.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Because he hid in a closet for four years, so him dropping out and not campaigning any more wasn't a noticable difference.

Seriously, he did a tiny fraction of public appearances, press conferences, anything, that any other president in the modern era.

The only times we really heard from when he was shuffling from a vehicle into a building, a building into a vehicle, or rare occurrences of one vehicle to another

That's not an opinion, it's quantifiable fact.

And as we've found out in the last week, that was because his age had been an issue for a long time, and he just couldn't handle stuff like that.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

This was a massive failure of the media to not even attempt to hold a president accountable for lack of presence. If anyone needed more proof the fourth estate is dead, they got it.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Chris Clizza is probably the single person we could blame it on. And while it took him too long, he did release a YouTube video the other day apologizing for doing with Biden's age what rightwing media does with pretty much everything about Republicans....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WQKveT8Bzo

It's just he's mostly saying it now because CNN fired him. When he was cashing their checks he didn't "notice" that he was spreading propaganda.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
74 points (78.9% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2232 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS