I guess they want another international arms dealer back. However, I don't think that Trump is going to be as willing to appease as Biden has been.
San Francisco spends (very roughly) $100,000 a year per homeless person and that doesn't "end homelessness" there. It doesn't even come close. These dollar estimates are all unrealistic because the issue is generally not that there's insufficient funding. It's that the sort of person who is homeless long-term is often not the sort of person who would want to be housed in any housing that the government could reasonably provide.
Here in NYC there was controversy because the city government was telling some homeless people that they could choose between going to a shelter or being arrested but they couldn't remain camped where they were. If you want to end homelessness, you can't just build housing. You have to force these homeless people to live in it. Are you willing to do that?
This is a lot more reckless than I was expecting, and I didn't have high hopes. Denmark is a NATO ally. If the USA is challenging its territorial integrity like this, the ability of that alliance to act as a deterrent is going to be seriously compromised. That's bad for reasons bigger than Greenland.
Trump is doing more damage to the security of the USA and its allies than he would have if he merely sank a couple of aircraft carriers, and most voters aren't even going to be aware of that.
I have such a hard time when I need to stop doing one thing and start doing another, especially when that requires traveling somewhere. This gets me in trouble fairly often.
Some of the doctor killers surrendered immediately, but there were manhunts for ones who fled. The killers were usually caught quickly so most manhunts didn't need to be nationwide, but law enforcement considered the attacks a big deal. This guy managed to flee the country and the international hunt for him lasted over two years until he was caught in France and extradited.
The naming is not consistent. As Wikipedia puts it,
This article follows usage in the United States. Readers in most other countries should read "two-way" or "SPDT" for the United States "three-way"; and "intermediate", "crossover" or "DPDT" switch for the United States "four-way".
The switches I'm using are marked with cute "ON/ON" labels which I suppose could be a metaphor for something.
printer ink was somehow related to breakfast
For when you want your coffee really, really black.
This seems like the thread to ask. I am wiring up a two-way switch so that a person on either side of my bed can turn the bedside light on or off without having to roll over to the side that the light is on. Is... Is that gay?
But if you don't signal, how will the commoners know to make way?
Eh, if those things start launching then you're probably as good as dead anyway.
Although the law does not define what a reasonable policy should look like, it says the companies should not deactivate drivers for failing to drive enough hours, falling below a minimum customer rating or turning down ride offers and deactivation should not be based on the results of a background check or driver record, except in egregious circumstances.
Wait what? This sounds rather extreme. I suppose Uber could have some sort of mechanism for evaluating driver performance other than customer ratings, but I'm not sure what that could be in practice.
The sanctity of a lack of indigenous people. Everywhere in the Americas was indigenous territory once, so I don't see why this land is any different from all the rest. On the contrary, other land might still have a tribe with a historical claim to it, whereas this land clearly doesn't.
But yeah, a circuitous path to protecting rainforest...