1003
Ah yes the party of free speech.
And small government...
And “pro business”
load more comments
(1 replies)
Then again, stuff like these stickers are only needed due to the type of idiotic assholes who would remove them, existing.
You can't expect these people to be able to identify their own hypocrisy. Or to care if they do.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Democrats are against free speech because people on twitter will tell me I'm being racist or sexist when I post funny jokes.
Republicans are pro free speech because they don't ever tell me I'm a bigot, they just pass legislation that prevents me from publicly stating my political viewpoints that they do not agree with.
This is unironically how conservatives think.
load more comments
(10 replies)
they're so brave, they are willing to go to war with stickers
We've lost the wars on hunger, poverty, drugs, the middle-east and un-fucking the middle-east; why not go for stickers next? Goose egg omelettes for everyone!
load more comments
(2 replies)
After losing to Disney, it’s a safer bet!
load more comments
(4 replies)
Wtf is even their argument for this?!
Edit: I obviously know their motivation, what I wanna know is their excuse for why this is supposedly justified.
To a Republican, a safe space for people who aren't straight, white Christians is akin to a safe space for pedophiles/Satan/dark-skinned foreigners (all the same thing in their terms). The people they hate with everything in their being must not be allowed to peacefully exist. This is the very foundation of Republicanism/conservativism.
load more comments
(1 replies)
"Freedom of speech unless you're saying something that I don't like."
load more comments
(10 replies)
Imagine being such a coward that who someone else loves scares the shit out of you.
The party of small government people
I feel like the GOP has pretty much abandoned the "small government" pretense altogether.
load more comments
(7 replies)
The party of "Small Government" at it again.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Im not american so i dont know all the freedom of speech laws work but its so fucking convenient that republicans can just decide what is and what isnt freedom of speech.
You can put anything in your window that isn't fraudulent, straight pornography or otherwise illegal on its own.
"Kill x" would likely be illegal as it's incitement to violence. "x need to die" would likely be legal.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Republicans will not stop until they have the ability to legally shoot and kill anyone they perceive to be gay.
They won’t stop until they have the legal ability to shoot and kill anyone they disagree with. They just starting with gays to normalize it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
We should never, ever at face value take claims from Republicans or anyone that they're doing this for the children or whatever (not that we should have been in the first place regardless). Because they've been making it more clear than ever that they want to erase the entirety of the idea of LGBT+ people from existence.
load more comments
(1 replies)
"The assholes doth protest too much, methinks"
The Republicans seem to spend most of their time thinking about LGBTQ+.
Hmm.....
No "hmm...", don't do that shit to lgbtq people, they do it because they see them as less than human, full stop.
It's not them angry at others getting to be themselves while they have to suppress their true nature, it's just heirarchy.
Come on Desantis, no one’s voting for you. Stop being such a tryhard.
Slightly more than half of Florida voted for him to be governor, and it was clear he was a piece of shit then.
4.6 million out of 21 almost 22 million.
~21% of the state of Florida.
More than half the state didn't even vote. (Not saying that's better)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Slightly more than half of the people who Florida allows to vote you mean.
With gerrymandering coupled with voter suppression, it's easy to keep power in a state. You pack all the blue voters into as tiny of an area as possible, then make sure they get fewer voting machines and longer lines. This gets you fewer blue voters overall. Tie in a few other tactics, and you have yourself a solid republican majority in what should be a swing state.
Got to purge those voter rolls every chance you get, but only in the cities. You wouldn't want to accidentally purge a likely republican voter.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
How does this not violate the First Amendment?
The same way that all of these anti-gay, anti-minority bills work:
They absolutely violate the Constitution. The Republicans just don't care.
load more comments
(3 replies)
As a 🦅Conservative®🦅, I think people should be left alone to do what they want.
That is why I support this policy, Because Ron M. Desantis should be allowed to do what he wants.
But Ron Desantis isn’t a person. He’s a greasy nylon stocking stuffed full of purulent, rancid ground pork that somehow learnt to stand upright and wear high heels.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Hey, are you one of those "novelty accounts" I've heard so much about?
Novelty is the opposite of what is advocated for by 🦅Conservatives®🦅.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
But I thought god owned the rainbow™️? Now the good Christians are disavowing it??
When the rainbow stopped being a reminder that god won’t genocide the world AGAIN and started being a reminder of love and inclusion, man that was too much for those great purveyors of xtian love.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Some central Florida lawmakers said they were considering "all legislative, legal and executive options available" to stop business owners in a small town from voluntarily displaying rainbow decals in their windows indicating that they are a "safe place" for LGBTQ+ people who feel threatened.
Four Republican lawmakers wrote a letter to officials in Mount Dora two weeks ago warning that the new, optional city-sponsored program could put the central Florida community outside Orlando "in the crosshairs of potentially detrimental and absolutely unnecessary economic harm."
The lawmakers cited boycotts of Bud Light and Target, which followed the brands' efforts to promote diversity and inclusion of the LGBTQ+ community.
Mount Dora's city council approved the Safe Place Initiative last month.
Safe Place programs are visible throughout metro Orlando — as well as throughout the US — including ones sponsored by the Orlando Police Department, Orange County Sheriff's Office and Osceola County Sheriff's Office, all in central Florida.
The council's decision to approve the program has coincided with an uptick in anti-LGBTQ+ incidents, including vandalism last month at two LGBTQ+ centers in Orlando.
The original article contains 339 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 47%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
load more comments
(1 replies)
I don't understand why this is a headline, constitutionally, lawmakers can't do jack fuckin shit to forbid that.
There's a lot of things they can't do, until they do them anyway, which then either results in the other side wasting a bunch of time money fighting to get it overturned (during which the narrative is controlled by the assholes), or it doesn't actually get overturned, and they get something they want, but shouldn't have.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Ah the good ol’ “I’m not transphobic I’m just thinking of the pooor economy!”
Why wouldn't the article name the Republicans that signed the letter? Seems like poor journalism?
As a non-Anerican I read that Florida is being awful to a lot of people and I wonder, if people there notice a difference in rural or urban areas? Do people start to migrate to other states? Does it have an impact on the state and its economy? Or are these just impotent talking points designed to engage voters but with no effect on public life? Would love to hear from residents how to relativize all those horrible headlines..
load more comments
(3 replies)
This is really crazy. What's going in the US? Aren't LGBT groups protesting this?
load more comments
(3 replies)
I give you the party of small government. /S
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
1003 points (97.9% liked)
politics
19239 readers
1890 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS