237
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Two fake GOP electors in Michigan asked a judge this week to dismiss their charges, arguing that state Attorney General Dana Nessel conceded that they didn’t have criminal intent when she said they were “brainwashed” after the 2020 election.

Attorneys for fake electors Mari-Ann Henry and Clifford Frost separately filed motions to drop the case, citing the comments Nessel made last week to a liberal advocacy group. CNN obtained a recording of her appearance, where she said the GOP electors were “brainwashed” and “genuinely believe” former President Donald Trump won in 2020.

“Convictions would require proof that (Henry) intended by her actions to defraud,” Henry’s attorney wrote, adding that Nessel’s prosecutors “now claim that (Henry) believed Donald Trump won the election. If she had that belief, (Henry’s) alleged actions could not have been performed with the intent to cheat or deceive anyone.”

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] crypticthree@lemmy.world 112 points 1 year ago

If I genuinely believe that Jodie Foster wants me to kill someone, does that make murder legal?

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 17 points 1 year ago

Nice callback!

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I get this reference. Because I’m old.

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

If this works it’ll set a very disturbing precedence for right wing extremist actions in the US.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

It won't, the lawyers always try stupid shit. Especially in pretrial

Like Trump's lawyers just said that square footage was subjective so it can't be a crime to have wildly varying numbers that always worked in the defendant's favor.

They put that in writing, but when oral arguments came, they dropped it because they knew it wouldn't actually work. It's a stall tactic to make prosecutors waste time they could be spending on the case. Throw out a dozen ridiculous defenses, that way prosecutors have to have a plan for whatever they actually go with

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 28 points 1 year ago

Like Trump’s lawyers just said that square footage was subjective so it can’t be a crime to have wildly varying numbers that always worked in the defendant’s favor.

"You see, Your Honor, it was very cold the morning they were taking the measurements, and..."

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago
[-] Infynis@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

Your Honor, do judges know about...shrinkage?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agree. However, it’s not really known by most people that that is the defense’s job. “Justice” is entirely the responsibility of the prosecutor. They have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, they have to do it correctly, and if they find anything that undermines their own case they have to present it. The defense does not, that’s the way our system is set up.

Television and other media makes it look like the defense is also responsible for finding the truth and making everything just. That’s incorrect. Defense’s role is to keep the overwhelming power of the state, and all the tools at its command, including corrupt police, etc., at bay.

So is this a stupid argument? Oh hell yeah. But when you can’t pound the facts, pound the table.

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Louis Rossmann did a series of videos dealing with NY real estate agents. It appears to be completely normal to lie about the size of a space there.

[-] geekworking@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Most drivers go over the speed limit. That doesn't make speeding legal.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

If they get their case dismissed on these grounds we will see Trump followers straight up commit acts of treason and may even go as far as overthrowing some state governments.

They always point and say "hey I was brainwashed " and point to this trail. Hope judge isn't that stupid.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Hmm, brainwashed by Facebook posts. Clearly they're not competent functional adults, so the solution is simple, declare them wards of the state and assign them a guardian who has to supervise them and do things like set a curfew they need to be home by. If you admit in court that you're not a functional adult, you don't get to be treated like a functional adult.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I like it also takes away your right to vote and to own a firearm.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Don't forget driver's license as well. Couldn't trust someone like that to operate such a dangerous piece of equipment.

[-] Case@unilem.org 2 points 1 year ago

If only there were a place where we could house dangerous, mentally unstable people from the populous.

Of course, for me to have any thought on imprisoning people, I must first recognize the multitude of judicial and correctional atrocities that happen seemingly daily all over the country.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They still had the mens rea to defraud the state as false electors even if they were delusional enough to believe the election was fraudulent. They didn't believe they were the actual electors at any point.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It doesn't matter whether they believed the election was stolen. It's not illegal to believe that, and that's not what they're accused of.

What actually matters is that they knew they were not the duly-appointed electors for their state. That's what makes it fraud. That's why they're criminals. And that's why they should spend a few decades confined to a small room where they can think about what they've done.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

"Objection your honor, I'm an imbecile! "

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Won't drop the charges but how about you spend the next ten years in padded room wearing a nice warm jacket.

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

At least they admit it's a cult.

[-] antizero99@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They also had to define what woke was in court. Nothing has changed. Nothing will change. They would happily join a cult and kill their first born if it meant owning the libs. It's really sad as well as a sign of the mental health and education issues in this country.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

i deserve leniency, I committed the criminal act because I'm an idiot

Sure sure, let's go with that.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
237 points (98.8% liked)

News

23664 readers
3596 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS