427

“The temporary restraining order granted by the Travis County district judge purporting to allow an abortion to proceed will not insulate hospitals, doctors or anyone else from civil and criminal liability for violating Texas’ abortion laws,” Paxton said in a statement shortly after the judge’s decision. “This includes first degree felony prosecutions…and civil penalties of not less than $100,000 for each violation.

Paxton added, ominously: “The [judge’s temporary restraining order] will expire long before the statute of limitations for violating Texas’ abortion laws expires.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gsfraley@lemmy.world 146 points 1 year ago

What an unbelievable piece of shit. This dude is actually a demon and seriously hateful person. He shouldn't be screaming around at doctors and women for protecting their lives, he should be screaming into pads at a psych hospital.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

He’s a con man and a grifter coddling his base in hopes of more “donations”.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Why not both?

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Every time I see a shooting star, I wish for him and Abbott to get aneurysms.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Exactly. A typical conservative.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He should be screaming at the walls of a prison cell, because he's a criminal on top of everything else you said.

[-] buddhabound@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's terrible, and he's a terrible person. But, I had concerns that this case getting decided too fast would hurt the other case trying to overturn TX's ban. One of the arguments in the state-wide ban case was that women could go to the court and get permission for abortion as needed. That's a horrible solution that doesn't scale, but if this case was too quick to resolve, the court could use it for cover and not have to rule on the overall ban in TX.

Paxton acting like such an entitled prick about this ruling might actually help both cases survive. This case will get a stronger opinion by the judge, and the other case won't be able to just point to this case as a "see you don't need us" scapegoat way out of actually ruling on the larger ban question state-wide.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago

File under "more evidence it's not about the life of the fetus"

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

Actual monsters. Where the fuck is Paxton's indictment/trial date? Fuck these Cuckservatives 🖕

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 51 points 1 year ago

He's already been acquitted on corruption charges for his blatant actions. Because Republicans will never vote to hold one of their own accountable.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That was a state impeachment, the person you are responding to is asking about the Federal indictment for Securities Fraud that this shitstain has been under for 8+ years now.

The trial is a reminder that Paxton's legal problems persist even after the Texas Senate acquitted him last month in an impeachment trial on unrelated allegations. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick presided over that trial and has faced intense criticism for taking $3 million from a pro-Paxton group in the lead-up to the trial.

"Unlike the impeachment, this is going to be a fair trial," special prosecutor Kent Schaffer told reporters after the hearing. "This judge is not corrupt. This judge is not on the take."

He should literally be in prison right now.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 15 points 1 year ago

That was only the political impeachment. The FBI criminal investigation is still ongoing

[-] Nach@midwest.social 58 points 1 year ago

I hope he needs medical care and every doctor refuses to help. Literal monster.

[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That would be nice but I don't imagine there are many doctors who would refuse to care for him, because their oath is to care for the sick and wounded and to show them compassion even if they don't deserve it.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Ok then we need to regulate his life too.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Seriously, imagine being so fucking stupid, self-entitled, and scientifically illiterate that you cannot accept the brutality of the real world where fetuses can have genetic defects that make them non-viable. I'm not even surprised anymore by the sheer level of willful stupidity and back-bending these fucking morons will go to in order to satisfy the infantile fantasies of their supporters.

In a just world all the women Ken Paxton has caused life-long pain and suffering would be allowed to slowly slice off his genitals with a mandoline or a zester.

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

For every raging conservative politician idiot there are thousands of raging idiot conservative supporters loving every hateful statement coming from their mouth.

Make sure you VOTE.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

cannot accept the brutality of the real world

He's a conservative. The brutality is the point.

[-] finthechat@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

Seriously, imagine being so fucking stupid, self-entitled, and scientifically illiterate

Allow me to paraphrase: imagine being a Republican

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Except it's not stupidity, they're trying to take the US back to the 1950's for white men.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

It also goes against everything the Bible actually says regarding abortion. The mother's life is more important. Hell, purposefully causing a miscarriage was only a fine under Biblical law.

He's a fucking monster & I can't wait to see him incarcerated Federally. I will actually write him to taunt him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

How unusual, I thought Paxton liked avoiding law enforcement for breaking the law. He certainly avoids his own summons.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Wilhoit 's Law:

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

To state the obvious, he's the former.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Just remember, an AG is not a judge or medical professional. They do not judge trials or pass convictions or decide on what course of treatment is appropriate for a patient.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

They don't have to be a Judge to ruin your life. How many people can go months without a job and pay tens of thousands in legal fees because you've been jailed on charges that a judge/jury will later find you innocent.

The AG doesn't have to pay you back for that.

[-] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

But they do decide whether or not to prosecute someone for committing a crime.

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

Then as more prenatal departments close and doctors move out of state many will be confused by why there is this lack of services available and why younger family members are facing a hard time trying to give birth or find the medical support they need.

It wasn't that hard when they were young. Life was just great when they were younger... /s

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

They'll change their tune when their own daughter dies giving birth. That's all it'll take.

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

I wonder where the politicians will go to get their mistresses done?

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Quick flight to as California Beach resort. All inclusive. Very posh.

[-] CeeBee@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I have a feeling that the people who support this guy are also the group that think vaccinating babies is evil and that home births are better.

I literally had a TON of women on Instagram try to attack me for calling out a post saying doctors and hospitals cause more harm than good in the US.

Most of it was along the lines of "women have been giving birth without doctors for thousands of years, our bodies know what to do", all while ignoring the fact that both infant mortality and women's birthing mortality rates have dropped from around 1.5% (of ALL women, not just pregnant women) to 0.015% (don't quote me on that, it's been a while since I looked up the numbers).

I even had one woman say that because I'm a man that I'm not allowed to say anything and her "genetic feminine memory", as if she's some Gao'uld symbiote from Stargate, trumps all "so-called medical doctors degrees".

How do you talk with these people?

[-] Bunnylux@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Absolutely horrifying story. What the fuck.

[-] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I really hope they just ignore him. I understand there are significant risks and consequences here but at a certain point doing the right thing has to trump whatever possible negatives would come about from disobeying an unjust law.

Even if you did lose your medical license and paid a hefty fine I feel like you'd ultimately be fine. There's gotta be a doctor out there that would revel in the fact they'd be known as the kickass doctor that disobeyed Ken Paxton. I'm sure you could pivot into something else. Might even be happier and richer making a YouTube channel or TikTok clock or whatever it is the kids are doing these days.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I share your idealism, but I keep convincing myself that nobody is that brave.

[-] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

We're in a real sorry state if hoping for the existence of one good doctor out of all the doctors can somehow be considered idealism

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know the law to well but I wonder what would happen if the mother tried to place attempted murder charges against the attorney general using the precident that a judge already ruled it to be a legal health procedure. Would a judge not be able to place him in prison denying bond because the threat made is still possible?

[-] LavaPlanet@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I hear rumours that losing your medical licence only really applies to that one state, over there. Image if all the doctors lose their licence, just in those states that don't allow abortion. Would no doctors at all make them rethink their stance?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago

I honestly can’t see his angle here. In Ireland, a similar case galvanized the famously culturally catholic population in support of abortion. This would be a slam dunk to very publicly allow as a sign that this is a reasonable law. Not allowing it is obviously, clearly pointless in and of itself, as the fetus is non viable. Not allowing it is politically a show of power, but one that even pro life people historically don’t support. He must just think people are different in Texas and Ireland, but I hope he’s wrong.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

It's a losing battle, but Republicans (particularly the ones in power) have been responding to that by doubling down for the past thirty years. It convinced their base that it's a display of strength and leadership while everyone else looks on in horror.

I guess we'll see if their strategy ultimately pays off.

[-] meathorse@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Are doctors legally bound by the "do no harm" Hippo-oath or have I watched too many shows and it's like the "are you a cop, you gotta tell me" lie?

At this point, the only way forward I see is for all doctors banding together to refuse healthcare to any lawmakers, politicians etc that have restricted healthcare to others. Then just wait for one of them to break a leg, get appendicitis, cancer or a mild car crash...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Bring it. I hope this goes all the way to the Supreme Court and they lose. This will spectacularly backfire.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Um.... Our illegitimate "supreme" court is who caused this. This was always their intention. This is all part of the conservative plan for the country.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Have you not been following the SC lately? That's exactly what he wants to happen.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I guess I’m just hoping by the time it gets there, maybe some sanity will have returned. Wishful thinking I guess.

I think you’d be more likely to see the court outlaw it entirely the next time than repudiate their bullshit Dobbs decision.

The only way the court will be swayed is if some of the conservative fucks die or congress adds justices to make the court more in line with the public.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The baby has no chance of survival, but under Texas law, there are only two options available to Cox: a vaginal delivery, or a C-section.

Travis County Judge Maya Guerra Gamble heard from both Cox’s lawyers and the state of Texas — whose lawyer argued that Cox didn’t meet the threshold for a medical exception to the state’s multiple abortion bans — earlier this week.

On Thursday, Judge Gamble reportedly teared up as she read her opinion from the bench: “The idea that Ms. Cox wants so desperately to be a parent and this law may have her lose that ability is shocking and would be a genuine miscarriage of justice.” She granted the temporary restraining order, clearing a path for Cox to obtain an emergency abortion.

Cox, Gamble wrote in her opinion, “has already been to three emergency rooms with severe cramping, diarrhea, and leaking unidentifiable fluid.

Texas attorney general Ken Paxton wasted no time threatening anyone who would aid Cox in obtaining an abortion.

“The temporary restraining order granted by the Travis County district judge purporting to allow an abortion to proceed will not insulate hospitals, doctors or anyone else from civil and criminal liability for violating Texas’ abortion laws,” Paxton said in a statement shortly after the judge’s decision.


The original article contains 527 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Jilanico@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

miscarriage of justice

ಠ⁠_⁠ಠ

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
427 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19246 readers
3603 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS