150
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 34 points 8 months ago

Good. The fact that Trump is unstable and amenable using irrational conspiracy theories in order to justify robbing the poor to fill the pockets of the rich is a key reason to choose Biden over him.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 8 months ago

He needs to get some Gen Z folks to write the comments. Fuck political correctness, we need some spice and T. Imagine the white house account going "Sis look at what this troll of a former president tweeted today 💀💀💀 Let's unpack how problematic this whole vibe is."

[-] Meron35@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He has. Megan Coyne (gen Z) runs the official Whitehouse twitter, and was noted to be extremely sassy at calling out the hypocrisy of politicians who were against student loan forgiveness but personally benefitted from having their PPP loans forgiven.

White House Twitter thread on student debt forgiveness has NJ flair - https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/new-jersey/2022/08/26/white-house-nj-twitter-thread-megan-coyne-student-loan-debt-forgiveness/65458123007/

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'd rather have the adults back in our politics instead of continuing to degrade into that, thank you very much. Feels like I grew up from being a teenager over the last two decades while everyone else regressed back into it.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

The oldest Gen Zs are 27 now.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I realize that. I was speaking about all the childishness. Shit like hurling insults across social media like we're at fucking recess again. The fucking boomers are doing it too.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 months ago

Sure, that’s a great aspiration, but we’re just dopamine seeking animals, and the oligarchs who control nearly all of the media (social and otherwise) know that, too. They make great money off reducing the tone of politics to “us vs them” and petty scorekeeping. They’ve more or less trained everyone in the U.S. since the 1980’s to approach politics this way. At this point I’m not even sure it’s ideals vs dopamine seeking behavior, so much as constant exposure to a desired behavior pattern.

Plus, If we’re both the spectators and the gladiators in the coliseum, then we won’t have time to realize that we’re in a dying democracy.

[-] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 months ago

Why? The ‘adults’ clearly aren’t doing shit.

And gen z has the most to lose if shit continues heading downhill..

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I was okay with a boring government when I was a kid. If the government tried to be all "hello, fellow kids" on me back in the day, I would have laughed at it, and not in the good way.

But I understand what you mean.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

The irony is “the kids”, many of them, are in their 20’s.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
150 points (93.6% liked)

politics

19087 readers
3509 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS