890
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

And the app is just a glorified website (Electron app).

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago

download our app

Nah

delete account...

[-] Korbs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Literally me

[-] frezik@midwest.social 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A huge number of apps these days are web sites compiled into an app, and it shows. For example, an app should be able to remember your address and payment information without signing into an account, yet so many don't. Almost like they want to force you into signing up. Why might that be?

Just give me a mobile web page if you're going to do that shit.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

I have an app for my sprinkler system and it's a fucking nightmare. Not only is it basically just a web API, it's so transparently just a glorified browser with access to exactly one site that frequently my phone thinks that app will work for whatever else I'm trying to open.

Document? Sprinkler app. Web Page? Sprinkler app. Installing from a source other than Google? Oh you better believe the sprinkler app can do that.

Doing anything takes longer to load than it would take me to walk from anywhere on my property to the fucking box and hit whatever button I need to hit.

It frequently forgets what I entered for preferences. I can tell it a week ahead what days I want it to skip but if I do that more than 24 hours on advance I might as well not have done it at all.

Oh you want to make a payment online? Let your sprinklers do that for you. YouTube video? Sprinkler app. YouTube video about fixing your fucking sprinkler system? Sprinkler app.

Apparently the one thing it can't do is effectively manage my water usage. It's ONE job

[-] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

I think all of this stuff is just a big fad. Many people have already been switching back to "dumb" devices.

[-] dan@upvote.au 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Document? Sprinkler app. Web Page? Sprinkler app. Installing from a source other than Google? Oh you better believe the sprinkler app can do that.

Android apps tell the system which URLs they can open. If you click a Google Maps link, it can prompt you to open it in the Google Maps app. It sounds like whoever created the sprinkler app misconfigured the app and it's saying that it can open all URLs, not just the URLs it cares about. They probably read a tutorial about how to make a webview in Android and didn't know what they were doing :)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Just yesterday, Mrs. Warp Core was trying to enroll with an online service. The self-service email confirmation link refused to function correctly in Firefox on a desktop operating system (Windows in this case). It worked flawlessly on Firefox+iOS. Said link also shuttled the user straight off to the phone app.

I'll add that nearly ever other aspect of their public facing web, including the online chat support, worked flawlessly everywhere I tried it. This all just reeked of hostile design.

When asked about why this is, I simply said:

The browser provides good security and choice for the user. Apps provide good security and control for the vendor.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

This piece has no real point. No hidden info, no resolution, no exposé, no call-to-arms really.

It's just "there are way too many apps", which we already knew.

What a weak article.

[-] Debs@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah. The Atlantic kinda sucks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

It’s behind a paywall for me. Good to hear I don’t have to bother with an archive link

[-] JollyG@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Used get my haircut at one of those "no appointment needed" haircut chains. Then they got an app, and every time I went it was "Why aren't you using the app? You need to use the app. Next time use the app. Download the app on your phone. It's gonna be an hour wait because you didn't use the app."

Now I just go to a local place.

I just cut my own hair.

But yeah, this trend is frustrating. When I get food from Jimmy Johns or a handful of other quick meal places, they bring up the app every single time. Yeah, I could get a free sandwich or whatever occasionally, but I really don't want yet another app on my device. If that choice resulted in a worse experience, I'd find a different service.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

The most ironic part...

.... an ad for an app for the article....

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I just go without.

the overwhelming majority of apps are nothing but websites wrapped in apps that strip away all the privacy and protections anyway, and demand far to many permissions for shit that are completely irrelevant to their purpose (because they want to siphon literally everything out of your phone and monetize the information).

I'd rather miss a deal, a sale, or whatever, than to deal with that shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Open source social media app: 30MB full size.

Privative social media app: 300MB install + 500 MG data full size 700MG

Go figure. I could have thousand of apps. If they were not packed with intrusive software to get all my data and to lock the company IP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 373 points 2 days ago

You can do almost anything with a website that you could do with an app. The only reason they are pushing the apps so hard is because they can collect a lot more data than a website can.

[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 202 points 2 days ago

As Cory Doctorow put it, "An app is just a web-page wrapped in enough IP to make it a felony to add an ad-blocker to it."

[-] doctortran@lemm.ee 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The cloud is many things, but most of all, it's a trap. When software is delivered as a service, when your data and the programs you use to read and write it live on computers that you don't control, your switching costs skyrocket. Think of Adobe, which no longer lets you buy programs at all, but instead insists that you run its software via the cloud. Adobe used the fact that you no longer own the tools you rely upon to cancel its Pantone color-matching license. One day, every Adobe customer in the world woke up to discover that the colors in their career-spanning file collections had all turned black, and would remain black until they paid an upcharge:

The cloud allows the companies whose products you rely on to alter the functioning and cost of those products unilaterally. Like mobile apps – which can't be reverse-engineered and modified without risking legal liability – cloud apps are built for enshittification. They are designed to shift power away from users to software companies. An app is just a web-page wrapped in enough IP to make it a felony to add an ad-blocker to it. A cloud app is some Javascript wrapped in enough terms of service clickthroughs to make it a felony to restore old features that the company now wants to upcharge you for.

I legitimately want to scream sometimes as I feel the continual death of local computing and actual software, and it depresses me to no end how few businesses or users see it for what it is.

And it's exactly this: a trap. A trap users people are racing into, and they have no idea, at all, how bad it's going to get when the doors close behind them.

The rest of us are left with little recourse. Looking at the difference between Outlook and New Outlook is genuinely depressing because that's the future we're all being shepherded into against our will. I swear, in like 10 years, Windows will mostly just be a kiosk for Edge.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 91 points 2 days ago

This is the main reason why I seldom install anyone's "app".

Most of these apps aren't true apps anyway, they're just customized browsers that lead you to a website and are free to collect as much data from you and your phone as they want.

I'll go on your website first if I have to and 9 / 10 I get what I want. Besides, I'll only ever visit the service once or twice so I don't need to install a permanent app on my phone for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 76 points 2 days ago

TBH I dont use an app for anything that can be done in the browser, especially when mobile websites ask me tl get their app.

[-] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 21 points 2 days ago

I'm the same way. The less apps there are on my phone, the better. Also, using the web app is the only way to block ads on certain sites such as Instagram or Twitter.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

This is partly corporate greed and partly a failure of the Web. A website should be all you need. You shouldn't need a separate app for every little thing.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago

It's not a failure of the web, it's a failure of corporations to accept their place as just a tab in my browser. It's also easier to track users, exploit vulnerabilities, etc. from within a mobile app.

[-] s_s@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Also, push notifications. Most things could be done from a browser, but corpos have to have their push notifications.

It doesn't matter if you're the guy who turns every notification off and manages all those... 9/10 people won't.

If all I'm doing is looking at your catalog, it should work in a mobile browser. That way if I - a Tarheel - find myself in the midwest, I can go "does Menards have 1/4-20 hanger bolts?"

I'll install an app if it runs mainly on my phone, like a media player or a calculator or maybe even a file viewer. Mobile games...that ship has sunk, frankly.

[-] doctortran@lemm.ee 61 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I recently re-downloaded the Michaels app while I was in the Michaels checkout line just so I could apply a $5 coupon that the register failed to read from the app anyway.

There's your problem right there.

Does this author not understand how dumb this makes him look? You downloaded an entire app, in the checkout line, for a $5 coupon on something you were likely overcharged for in the first place?

Even when you’re lacking in a store-specific app, your apps will let you pay by app. You just need to figure out (or remember, if you ever knew) whether your gardener or your hair salon takes Venmo, Cash App, PayPal, or one of the new bank-provided services such as Zelle and Paze.

If only there was a universal form of payment that you could keep in your pocket and pull out to use anytime with very minimal interaction. Maybe a card or something.

Apps are all around us now. McDonald’s has an app. Dunkin’ has an app.

Why are you using them?

Every chain restaurant has an app. Every food-delivery service too: Grubhub, Uber Eats, DoorDash, Chowbus.

Why are you using all of them??

Every supermarket and big-box store. I currently have 139 apps on my phone. These include: Menards, Home Depot, Lowe’s, Joann Fabric, Dierbergs, Target, IKEA, Walmart, Whole Foods

Why the fucking hell do you need any of these?!

This is literally the 2024 equivalent of your mother having a dozen toolbars in Internet Explorer because she kept clicking on coupons.

Just go to the place, pull out your credit card, pay the cashier, and leave. How the hell does any functioning adult blame the technology when they have this little self control?

load more comments (31 replies)
[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

I legitimately do not have enough space on my phone to install all the crappy bloatware of all the stores I go to. They quite literally ask the impossible of me.

[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 25 points 2 days ago

I have yet to see an app that does something a website could not do...

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

most apps are just containerized websites.

You know why?

Cause browsers do a lot to protect your data from invasive sniffing.

but if you containerize it in an app, you can remove all those pesky safety measures Which lets you turn a customer into a product by siphoning up all their data and information.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] sheogorath@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Harvest data more efficiently for our corporate overlords :)

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 119 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My favorite part of the 30 day dumb phone challenge I did recently: I couldn't install your crappy app even if I wanted to.

A little over halfway through the challenge, was paying for my order at a local eatery, and the cashier started plugging their new app and rewards points and digital coupons and shit. I was like "I'm gonna stop you right there: flip phone." and pulled it out of my pocket and brandished it like I was the sheriff of Luddite-ville.

Kinda like this, but "Flip phone!"

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

Amount of store apps on my phone: zero.

My wife has an app that is basically a card holder. Instead of pulling out a loyalty card, she pulls up the one app that has all of them scanned/copied. It's great.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 days ago

One big supermarket chain here has an app where you get a few cents bonus discount on already discounted items with the app coupon. The in-store announcement praises it as the first place of some insitute's supermarket app ranking. Even if that institute were legit, the ranking fair and the spot well-deserved, I always felt like that's a competition with no winners.

I recently switched to GrapheneOS and decided to avoid the Google Play store entirely, and honestly, the inconveniences have been pretty limited. The only bank I've had trouble with is Citi, everything else (I've tried several others) work fine through the browser. Likewise for most services I use, the web version works fine, though occasionally I'll need to use the "desktop" version.

Some services just don't work properly on the web, but most of the ones I used to use through an app work just fine. Give it a try, maybe together we can send a signal that apps should only exist when they provide value.

[-] yikerman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It still depends. I live in China and the internet here suckass. Every product, say taobao(Amazon), xianyu(eBay), Alipay(PayPal), WeChat(instant msg), banking, etc. that is crucial to your daily usage mandatories an application. The API is closed and the webapp has no functionality other than a banner with "go fuck our mobile app". The only way to bypass these privacy beast apps is to live in an isolated wood cabinet with self-sufficient agriculture.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
890 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

58492 readers
3900 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS