613
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

President Joe Biden touted his administration’s economic recovery efforts, citing job growth, reduced inflation, and infrastructure investments, as he prepares to hand off a strong economy to Donald Trump.

Biden criticized Trump’s proposed steep tariffs on imports, warning they could harm the economy and reintroduce inflation.

Trump plans tariffs against China, Mexico, and Canada, raising concerns about trade disruptions similar to those seen during his first term.

Economists caution that such policies could quickly reverse recent economic gains and weaken the U.S. economy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

We've been doing this seesaw for the last 30 years. Republicans are that guy we've all seen at work who gets nothing done but gets credit for everyone else's work, and fails up because of it.

[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It truly is a Homer Simpson v Frank Grimes situation. With the DNC being Frank Grimes Im praying for the day they actually lose it.

[-] b3an@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

What really irks me about this, is that the progression forward is then twice as slow because it’s two steps forward one step back, two steps forward one step back. This is not how to run a fucking country.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 65 points 2 weeks ago

Just do another round of stimulus check and let Donny deal with the bill. 😏

[-] Today@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

And this time put Joe Biden's name on the checks.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 14 points 2 weeks ago

"We'll allow it, but only for corporate America and those making >$500k/year" -Sinema and Manchin

[-] nobody158@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago

This would be the best way to end the last 20 days, and mass parsons because fuck it whynot

The best way to end it is for Biden to have Trump and friends disappeared to a CIA black site.

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

That's a totally legal, and very cool thing to do.

The supremely corrupt court hath made the president into a king with unchecked power to slaughter the entire United States.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NeatoBuilds@mander.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago

Here comes Biden with the steel chair!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Can't do that without also controlling congress which he doesn't.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 50 points 2 weeks ago

more like stabilize. without the second term to actually make some progress this is going to go in the shitter fast.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago

People really can’t understand the economy turns like the Titanic. Trump fucked it, but we didn’t see the real effects until Biden’s term. We were heading into another Great Depression, and coupled with the effects of Covid, people massively underestimate how well the economy actually did under Biden.

Trump will coast on the Biden administration’s success for a while, and will take the credit. Once he fully fucks everything (and IF there are fair elections in 2028, which doesn’t seem likely), a future democratic administration will be blamed for the effects of trump’s fuckery. Repeat ad infinitum.

That’s how it’s worked for a century, and uninformed voters will always fall for it.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Nah. It takes much more to build than to burn down. This is why bush senior had to do the things that angered his base. Whats been built in the last four years will fall within 2. Even trumps first term it was actually covid which allowed him to get through it. Obama was not able to really get things good in two after bush jr.s two wars and when trump dropped rates and overheated everything the market was due for a big crash but covid ironically created this wierd condition were it bounced back due to the stimulus of the checks and just that generally the haves did not want to fuck around with that shit going. Everything became about keeping things going. Its gonna be a rough few years coming up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You thought inflation was bad. Get ready for Trumpflation.

I guess that's better then renaming the war economy "Bidenomics"

Grow food if you can now folks shit is about to get bad. Buy flour in mass if you can.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Not flour, unground wheat berries. Cheaper to buy in bulk with a much longer shelf life.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yarr@feddit.nl 38 points 2 weeks ago

If the democrats are so sick of getting swapped out maybe they should field some decent candidates.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Unless your idea of a good candidate is George Clooney or Oprah than this isn't a problem that can be fixed with 'better candidates'.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 35 points 2 weeks ago

Those answers make me unreasonably angry. The absolute stupidity is astounding.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CitricBase@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

If voters demonstrated one thing this year, it's that the decency of the candidate is utterly irrelevant.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

There was nothing wrong with Harris except seven million people who voted for Biden weren't ready for her to become president.

[-] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

It is more like 250k in 4 states that flipped.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yarr@feddit.nl 4 points 2 weeks ago

There was nothing wrong with Harris except seven million people who voted for Biden weren’t ready for her to become president.

I didn't enjoy what she did as district attorney. I would also argue if she was not electable in 2024, then she doesn't meet the bar of a "good candidate". Now her viability is irrelevant entirely, unless she plans to run in 2028.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 weeks ago

It basically happens every cycle, easy to go back all the way to George Bush Sr -> Clinton ( if not earlier).

But the problem is, the current economic boom is even more K-shaped than any other in recent history; half of the population are struggling worse than before, but their plight is masked by an incredible boom for the other half.

I can’t blame the working class for thinking back to ~2016, and remembering things fondly.

Trump will only make the current situation worse, but I can at least understand how the US ended up in its current predicament.

[-] Lightsong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

What is K shape? Like V but added flat? Or just direction where right side of K goes both up and down?

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Chart taken from Investopedia’s article on K-shaped Recovery; but the underlying principle is the same: Some parts of the economy are performing so well that it masks the other sectors which are struggling.

i.e. the rich are getting so much wealthier, that when looking at the overall average the number is trending positively and not showing that the rest of society is getting poorer. This is one of the reasons when using aggregate measures, the median value is significantly more valuable than the average.

[-] halowpeano@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The rich got richer (top of K) the poor got poorer (bottom of K).

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

And we have several pandemic vectors on the rise - again. Well, with one major change, we now have a vaccine denialist in charge of core agencies. Prospects look good for the vulture industries.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

And one of the new viruses has a fatality rate above 50% in livestock, probably doesn't bode well for humans.

If there is a god maybe the covid was just a booster virus to get the smart portion of humanity prepped for the real plague, lol.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I see it more as speed of descent.

I'm of the opinion this country is sold, and died about half a century ago as a democracy, and this is just leftover momentum. All but waned momemtum.

Our vote isn't on whether to reorient the economy to reflect the priorities of its citizens, merely how, and if at all, to manage some of the social issue symptoms of our crumbling commons, the ruins of public education, as the owners search for new vectors of exploitation.

I see voting blue as akin to requesting we leave the water pumps turned on for this sinking ship to buy time(D), and voting red a vote turn them off because some passengers have been deluded into hating other passengers and really, really want to watch them drown(R) despite being in the same boat with them.

The holes are our economic policy, but ask either party about patching them and you'll get something akin to "What holes? This ship is unsinkable! If you think there's holes, you're the problem."

Dont worry though, there are lifeboats, just enough for the politicians and their donors. Wealth means not having any national allegience.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht.

GK Chesterton, The Man Who Was Thursday, 1908

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Lmao, he rebuilt the stock market.

That is not the economy.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

i'm holding a huge cash position, waiting for the inevitable downturn to buy up assets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tywarth@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Why does he look like Kim Jong Un in this picture 😂

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

He's a fat fuck?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
613 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers
3180 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS