615
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago

That is an appeal to authority, but not a fallacious one. Lawmakers know a lot about how and why people steal. Fallacious appeal to authority is when the authority you're talking about has no knowledge of the topic, for example quoting a psychologist on nutrition advice.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Lawmakers don't know shit about fuck. Sometimes they have experts available they listen to. Otherwise it's whoever spends the most, who they're buddies with, or what just feels like it will jive with their base at the time.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago
[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Fallacy fallacy.

Sometimes a person is insufferable and that's the problem.

Like with lawmakers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 week ago

It's also not whataboutism...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've actually had this dispute on Lemmy.

Dude kept insisting I tell him my income but refused to say how or why it would be relevant.

Ed: no joke, it was flyingsquid too which is a bit more funny tbh.

It's a very sensible conclusion when I've asked you how rich you are multiple times and you refuse to answer. Even after I told you my economic situation.

You're rich and you are embarrassed about it because it makes you look just as callous and dismissive of the poor as Elon.

[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago

To be fair, you did call them a petty tyrant for making a joke about trolling the sovcit posts as an IRS agent.

Also made me curious if you do enjoy some light tax evasion or are into the whole "I don't pay taxes because I am the only citizen in my own nation inside your nation" thing

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago

Your first mistake was choosing to debate one of the most argumentative people on Lemmy. Can only get weird from there

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

More than a dollar less than several billion.

[-] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago
[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Lets start a club!

[-] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I bet it’s even more than a thousand dollars a year!

If it isn’t, I’m so sorry buddy, and I hope your situation improves somehow.

[-] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

That’s something only a Geringverdiener™ would say!

/s

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

That's such a low bar for "rich". The difference between a millionaire and a billionaire is about a billion dollars.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago
[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 week ago

The best answer to that question avoids all fallacies.

"No"

[-] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago
[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago
[-] Sergio@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

I think gigachad could argue that it's Invincible Ignorance.

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That sounds like admitting defeat "you don't care about any arguments I could make"

[-] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That's a single authority falacy, in this case there is only one opinion, the person who's protecting their financial information, to promote the idea of not looking into someone's bank account. When there could be a legitimate reason to look into a person's finances.

In all seriousness in so far as the meme is presenting itself single authority is prudent. Like what if every decision about yourself everyone was always a stakeholder? That would be hell.

[-] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Slippery slope, if its no all the time you'll encounter a situation when yes is a critical answer.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago

Why did you post a screenshot of every argument I've ever been on on this platform?

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago

"No."

.....

Why do people deflect instead of just saying no?

[-] weker01@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was struggling to understand that for a long time too. It seems like it's a mix of being told that just saying no is not polite and an aversion to conflict. Especially when stating needs.

Some parents actively discourage their children to state their needs clearly and concisely from a very very young age.

[-] Hackworth@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Companies that give personality tests in the hiring process are largely looking at your "agreeableness" score. We're constantly taught (from an early age, as you mention) that the default answer should be "Yes." If you're creative, you might push it to "Yes, and..." But a plain "no" from anyone who isn't explicitly labeled as a "leader" is a non-starter in systems obsessed with hierarchy.

There are really only three options. Try to climb an existing hierarchy. Make your own hierarchy and place yourself atop it. Or operate within and between hierarchies without unnecessarily validating their existence. That last one's increasingly difficult by design. And honestly, the second one usually requires exploiting others.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Sure, that's fine in IRL. It fails on any kind of discussion board though, at least for anything not as comically egregious as "give me your banking details."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RandomStickman@fedia.io 20 points 1 week ago

Fallacy fallacy

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

I will gladly send you my banking details

Sarcasm is last refuge of the wittless .

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

That's almost what those words mean

[-] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago

Sure, my account number is 1 2 3 4 5

[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

What's your lemmy password?

[-] Birch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago
[-] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Why did you just post a bunch of asterisks?

[-] techt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[-] Live_Let_Live@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

actually funny meme

[-] sag@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago
[-] sag@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] indepndnt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's 942822688476

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

oh no. I've been on the left-hand side of this before. I knew what I was doing.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
615 points (95.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27266 readers
3472 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS