763
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Shortstack@reddthat.com 22 points 1 day ago

I would love to know how to disable telemetry on my own hard drive on wheels or at worst prevent it from phoning home. Mozilla did a great job bringing this issue to light but now we need actionable solutions that don’t rely on governments passing laws

[-] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Obviously... It's anti-libre software. It fails to include a libre software license text file, like GPL. We do not control it.

[-] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 147 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Let's be 100% clear, all of these cars with "smart" features are collecting your data and selling it. Insurance companies are also buying this information and using it to raise premiums if they determine you a "bad driver." Also this could reveal info such as where you live if anyone is determined enought depending on the info if stores (such as geolocation data).

Basically I'm saying wrap your car in tinfoil

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 90 points 2 days ago

I live in a small, rural community. The county sheriff's department just announced how they bought the GPS tracking data for every vehicle in the county and how it's going to "help calm traffic because they can predict where people are going to be speeding and can have an officer waiting"

The pre-crime department is starting and no one batted an eye.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Every time I hear something like this I'm glad I bought an old car without any connectivity.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

My car is a 2012, I'll be holding onto it until it falls apart.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Same, for now. Although, we have two ICE vehicles and want to swap to electric. I haven't looked, but I can't imagine there's a great selection of electric, but 'dumb' in the US, considering GPS was mandatory for new vehicles in .. 2016, I think?

I've also heard people say you can just pull the fuse for the GPS, but I'm still skeptical.

[-] wrinkletip@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

You can choose om the software if you want location services or not, but everyone leaves it on. This is what is leaked. If you turn it off it doesn't report in location centrally at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago

Basically I'm saying wrap your car in tinfoil

and don't ever let diagnostic tools with network access be connected to it. just as well could say never bring it to service, which is not really possible

[-] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

At this point, just get a bicycle without a battery.

Of course, sometimes you need to move heavy stuff and there's nothing you can do about it, bu I tend to save enough, not owning a car/motorbike that I can afford to pay for a pickup on those occasions.

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Hmm. Is there a faraday vinyl I can wrap my car in?

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago

Or, alternatively, would the pelts of tech billionaires offer any protection?

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

Or just pull the fuse to the antenna?

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 11 points 2 days ago

Are antennas usually behind a fuse?

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Mine was, it'll be called OnStar in the manual.

Here's a post with a pic https://sh.itjust.works/post/16735052

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ah, pretty sure that'd be the whole OnStar transceiver, too (which isn't a bad thing to disable...).

I thought the antenna itself was behind a fuse (as in, feedline has an inline fuse) which would be a peculiar design I think.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

After dieselgate and the discovery that VW was subjecting monkeys and humans to exhaust fumes in experimentation, their sales are still fine.

I honestly don't think consumers give a shit about what negative things companies do.

[-] LavaPlanet@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

I think they just don't know. People are oversaturated and oversaturated and overloaded, and suffering for scraps, nobody has time, mental space or money to be choosy. Researching companies, suspiciously doesn't show results. Finding that information isn't easy, by design. It might be released, on the same day something else happens. But mostly people aren't watching the news to the depth required to soak that stuff in, and don't have the extra energy to soak anything in. Everything sent into our hands and eyes as news is controlled by a few with vested inrests. It would be lovely if there was a place that collected atrocities and kept them fresh. Who stopped buying nestle after all the horrible things they've done. I can bet you have supported a company with your dollar, that's responsible for huge atrocities, it's almost impossible to avoid. Look at the stuff happening in the Congo atm, all the top brands, committing atrocities for new phones to be built. How much have we heard about all of that? There's so much. Where do you start. Funny story, I watched resident evil with my kid, just recently, and it was terrifying for whole new reasons. A top company who owns everything, goes into weapon manufacturing and creating advanced bio weapons, accidentally releases it, then doubles down continuously, shutting thousands in to die, and firing into crouds to cover up what it did. And that doesn't seem far fetched, any more. All for the ever expansion of money, something that has a finite amount set. Literally the only way to achieve ever expansion is to commit atrocities, there's a point where you take too much and the only option is atrocities to make more. And that's capitalism, baby!!

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

That’s why there will be many more Luigi’s before anything improves.

[-] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

How I barely had the emotional and mental bandwidth to read this comment. Entirely agree too lol

[-] Takios@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

Thank you. There is so much shit going on, keeping up to date with everything is literally unhealthy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Accidentally, lol. The point was to mine and sell the data, wasn't it? Not exactly private.

[-] Xanvial@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

The made public part is the accidental

[-] AAA@feddit.org 39 points 2 days ago

"Accidentally" is the new "through incompetence"

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Negligence. Volkwagen can afford competence, but chose not to invest in it.

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 98 points 2 days ago

A Volkswagen id4 was the best choice I had from work (Belgian companies give company cars for personal use as perks because of tax benefits).

I completely disagreed to all terms involving internet access in the vehicle, but I have no doubt they are tracking me without my consent too...

[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

If they are, make a complaint to your local governing body. See if they'll investigate it. Because it's not okay for them to agree to terms for you or to try to end around the agreement you made.

[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

There's no way to know though...

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago

Sure there is. Most people don’t have the hardware handy to do it, but at the end of the day it’s just a computer sending IPv4 traffic through an LTS cellular modem to an S3 bucket.

And if you know your car’s UDID you can probably look it up in said S3 bucket, since it was open to the public.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

You are aware that encryption exists, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Take your car into a dealer and ask them if the modem is connected. Frame is as you think it's malfunctioning and they'll look to see.

[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

I mean, they could disconnect it for you, but there's still no way to know if it's been transmitting data you don't want it to in the meantime

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 35 points 2 days ago

Is there a company yet that let's me pay them to internet disconnect and rip out sensors on a modern car?

[-] oldfart@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Dacia doesn't have that crap. They only have the mandatory SOS system.

BTW, if someone has a way to rip that system out, please share

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Anyone that has owned a recent VW, knew this was true. I would get text messages from my local dealer anytime I was close to needing an oil change.

[-] Rogue@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't that just be a time based notification rather then dependent on any privacy invading metrics?

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's so weird! Just like when my dentist calls me to an appointment when I've had a cavity for six years! Incredible! Just when I need to fill it!

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago
[-] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 61 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

From what a gathered, it was the classic misconfigured AWS S3 Bucket. ~~It's criminal how AWS still makes the default configuration insecure.~~

Edit: apparently buckets are private by default now, haven't set up S3 in a while.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

It was also the classic "collecting the information to begin with," and it's criminal how that is allowed, too.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 days ago

The default for net new buckets is actually very strict.

But it's that strictness that makes devs just to open it up to everyone and not learn proper IAM syntax.

The unfortunate part is that AWS made rules and privileges so nuanced and detailed that it makes people want to make everything public and deal with it "later".

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 day ago

"I told a joke to my wife. I laughed, my wife laughed, my smart toster laughed "

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 28 points 2 days ago

Has someone located the frequent visitors of "houses of ill repute" yet?

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

The republicans are on it in the US, but now they call them drag shows.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

…and hospitals.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago

GDPR/DORA monies when?

[-] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago

I don't get why they feel the need to keep it a secret.
Google takes GeoLocation data with maps and people happily use it. I even put reviews for places I go to.

If they were to just be above board about it while selling the stuff, they would have much happier customers and they could even get some legitimate use out of the data, like traffic status that Google does.

I'm not a fan of Google, but must say, they definitely managed to do better in this regard.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
763 points (99.9% liked)

Privacy

32517 readers
267 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS