I also celebrate the fact that there's an ocean between myself and Don Jr.
Everything under Trump seems to trace back to Putin. I think they are doing this to give false legitimacy to Putin's invasion into Ukraine. They will say "See? America is doing it so we can too".
plausible, even if just as a sideshow diversion. it's one of the only ways to explain the flaming shit-train of bonkers greenland/mexico/canada/panama rhetoric
It's a flea circus. If you are watching/listening to something insane happening then you aren't watching then steal an election in North Carolina or fast track a bunch of crazy deportation laws or Russian jets flying back and forth between NY, DC and wherever the fuck else.
If you are drowning in propaganda you eventually lose sight of the real issues.
Nope.
The desire for Greenland is rational, but evil.
Climate change is going to open up a lot of trade routes year round as a lot of the ice melts.
Greenland is very strategically placed for controlling those trade routes. It's basically the same reason Trump wants the Panama canel.
Edit: Trump is bad. It is stupid that I have to say this, but if you want to fight someone you have to understand why they do things and you can't just assume stupidity as that reason.
We literally have a statement for this 'Don't underestimate your opponents'
Lemmy.ml
loudly screaming how Trump isn't Putin's lapdog
The Trumps made no overtures to the government to meet with them (according to Greenland). So WTF is he doing there? Guess it's sorta like a campaign stop to drum up support?
Donny Jr. Is only there to do a documentary. He will not be meeting with any government officials and I'm sure the "documentary" was done there to make it look like he was trying to do government business.
Paragraph 6 of article
What documentary could possibly benefit from Don Jr's involvement?
Nothing with any credibility
Well, Dinesh D'Felon made a "documentary" or two, IIRC. I'm thinking about that level.
Now he can claim historical ownership because they were there first 😉
It's gonna be awesome when they pave over Greenland for a bunch of gas stations, walmarts, golf courses, etc. \s
Bruh, it's never gonna happen...
You know what Greenland is talking about lately?
Not joining America, they're trying to get independence from Denmark.
Like, there's no reason for any rational person to be talking about America absorbing Greenland, there's just no chance of it happening.
It's something stupid that Republicans are talking about so that we talk about how dumb they are instead of talking about the actual evil shit they'll really do.
But it gets clicks so the media writes about it, and people post those articles to social media.
And I get with all this my comment is the equivalent to a "reply all" telling people to stop "replying all"...
But fuck it.
Welcome to the age of "But the engagement! We just can't help ourselves."
It's Putins rationale. Putin wants to control all the land. He's playing risk irl.
they’re trying to get independence from Denmark
"We took a vote. Seven in favor, five against. Time to drop our decision in the Danish Your-Opinions-Go-Here trashcan and see what comes next."
And I get with all this my comment is the equivalent to a “reply all” telling people to stop “replying all”…
There's a broader Old School Imperialist attitude that Trump is cultivating with these kinds of wish-fulfilment posts. I don't think it isn't worth mentioning, but I do think his cabinet positions and plans for military promotions are more concerning than sending his Fredo coded son on extended overseas vacation.
Trump's lackeys want it for minerals, methane(aka natural gas) and oil. Also potentially water.
Not to pave over.
to take any of these threats seriously for a minute. absolutely none of the places the Tr team says America wants to take, would be for any purpose other than resource stripping. They dont want to govern any of these places, "taking" these places would mean military occupation, which I will remind you, the Americans have no stomach for. I'll come back to that in a minute.
But Panama, Greenland, Mexico, and Canada, none of these places under American control would be anything other than resource extraction zones. the populations would be herded into police state control zones run by Quisling governments, no one would have american rights, no voting. no guns. none of the benefits that MAGA and their traitor politicans promised them. It'd essentially be the Nestle situation. Corporations pilfering the country at literal gunpoint.
the national security excuse is null for Canada and Greenland (Denmark), both are already under NATO and both are already more or less allowing america to do as it pleases in the arctic against their own Sovereignty
and on the topic of Canada, and that Occupation I said I'd come back to. Americans have no stomach for occupation, they were in Afghanistan for 20 years and that turned the population hostile against the establishment. that was on the other side of the world, against an opponent who was culturally black and white different from them.
If you want an idea of how an American occupation of Canada would go, look no further than 2022's Russian invasion of Ukraine. Every day since that conflict began, Places in Russia have been catching fire and exploding, people are getting assassinated, the country is under attack from all sides from within, Why? because their enemy, the Ukrainians can blend in with the russian population effortlessly.
Trying to violentley and forcefully take away a country's sovereignty, who is on your border, who are visually, linguistically, and culturally so similar to you that you couldn't tell one from the other, is frankly a suicidal move. it didnt work for the big bad boisterous Russians, it wont work for America. It'll just be "terrorism" every day of the week until the blue states have had enough of it, and decide that the "rebels" are right, and now it's Civil war 2.0
Don't forget potential Trump Ski Resorts lol
Eh, those would be likely owned by Vale Resorts eventually.
Their CEO seems to be a gilded spoon brat, having worked mostly at VP and up levels.
Ditto their exec Chairman, who has worked at a board of directors level there since 1996.
Can someone take them on a tour of the ice sheet, and then accidentally forget to bring them back?
"This isn't the snow I was thinking....!"
-- jr
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News