219
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 8 points 9 hours ago

Instead of the brown shirts, we'll have the red hats.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Inb4 Trump Youth

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago
[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 hours ago

It's actually exactly like the SA, the Nazi paramilitary force before the SS. The SA was composed entirely of thugs empowered to beat up "the opposition", secure rallies, and secure elections (intimidate). The SA was purged in "the night of long knives" as soon as Hitler got real political power because an extrajudicial group of armed thugs is a huge liability when you're the one in power. The people who did the purging were mostly police and government officials who were loyal to Hitler, and they later became the SS.

It's a fascinating and terrifying history because Trump is a Hitler fanatic and he clearly plans to use his Maga thugs to gain power then purge them as soon as they're a liability to him.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Well call me Aldo raines.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The SS was composed of a bunch of junior officers and German police already deeply embedded in the Hindenburg government.

This headline makes it sound like Trump is going to deputize a bunch of terminally online cranks, which sounds like more of a SovCit tier grift than a serious policy. Far more disturbing would be Trump doing what we've already seen other state and municipal leaders allow during the BLM marches and the pro-Palestine college protests. Telling the cops, the state troopers, and the national guard to go wild, then blaming the civilians for all the damage that follows.

I could very easily see Trump signing off on an EO that says you can't prosecute the police for... anything, really. Then Red-State Republicans goading their officers to go ham on the blue cities, while the national press treats the general police brutality as some kind of War on Crime. Courts squelch any kind of civil liabilities for the police. Liberals get clubbed into submission. Centrists denounce "both sides" (but so as not to offend conservatives in any way). Conservatives go full sicko-mode because they can.

Its less like The SS and more like Israeli Settler Movement. Some AM Talk Radio guy saying we need to "Squash the Bugs" and you end up with shit like what's happening in The West Bank, as settlers club Palestinian locals in the street and the Israeli police fire on any Palestinian that resists.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

That's where he found his anti BLM group. He got a bunch of federal agents.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 3 points 12 hours ago

Its less like The SS and more like Israeli Settler Movement. Some AM Talk Radio guy saying we need to "Squash the Bugs" and you end up with shit like what's happening in The West Bank, as settlers club Palestinian locals in the street and the Israeli police fire on any Palestinian that resists.

History doesn't repeat but it sure as shit rhymes

[-] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 58 points 19 hours ago

I don't have links handy right now, but take a look at DeSantis' Florida State Guard.

  1. Unlike the National Guard it only answers directly to the Governor of Florida and there is no precedent for the federal government to take command of it.
  2. It was publicly billed as a sort of disaster relief agency, but volunteers reported that significant amounts of training time was being dedicated to paramilitary topics like riflery and small unit tactics.
  3. There is also a small (30-50 people) QRF, SWAT-like element to this organization, and it got out that they were receiving paramilitary training from a private organization that currently employs convicted war criminal Eddie Gallagher, if you remember that fucker.
[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Coming this fall on Fox:

Meal Team Six: Miami

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 26 points 19 hours ago

Gallagher was that SEAL that Trump pardoned from war crimes, right?

[-] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago

Specifically he murdered POWs, once with a knife, and then threatened to kill any of his team that ratted on him.

He is kind of the poster child of the disdain conservatives have for modern rules of engagement. They still think he was falsely maligned and that he only "did what he had to do." Of course, that's why he was pardoned. They need people like him going forward.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

His fellow snipers and the rest of his squad admitted that he also shot randomly at civilians, to the point that his squad ACTIVELY FUCKED WITH HIS RIFLE SCOPE to make sure he'd miss the first shot and give civilians some time to get to cover as he cycled his rifle.

The dude was enough of a psychopath that they screwed the dude WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO KEEP THEM SAFE so he wouldn't randomly murder civilians.

You also forgot the part that he stabbed a POW to death, took pictures with the corpse, and sent them to his buddies stateside.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 16 hours ago

COOL STUFF. AWESOME.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 59 points 20 hours ago

MAGA Force ... national guard (under a central leader) ... partol groups ... whatever you want to call them

There is a precedent for all this

"Sturmabteilung"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

[-] d00ery@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I was looking for the brownshirts link!

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 51 points 21 hours ago

The Red Shirts are coming. GOP you are really making a wonderful future for us.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago

Red Hats, you mean. They've had the uniform for years already.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago

Every fascist movement requires paramilitary thugs; Trump's is no different.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 34 points 20 hours ago

Sounded ridiculous like it was just random idiots.

But it's a lot more dangerous and more likely than that:

Former White House adviser Stephen Miller said enforcement will be managed by red state National Guard troops that the Trump administration would deputize as immigration enforcement officers, according to the report.

He could and would 100% do that, Govenors wouldn't fight it, and even if they did, the SC would side with trump.

They really should have said "National guard" in the headline instead of "MAGA force".

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 15 points 19 hours ago

But for real, this is the sort of thing that would trigger a progression of events that would almost certainly lead to open civil war. Think about it:

  • deputization of specific red-state and red-friendly NG and CBP personnel occurs
  • theyre sent to blue states and blue metro areas in particular
  • they probably do some Krystalnacht shit, and also probably try to fuck with the state and local governments at the very least, and likely try to do outright violent coups against them
  • blue Governors who are on the ball are gonna be like “fuuuuuuuck that” and mobilize their own NG contingents for the defense of their own states and its population
  • trump tries to nationalize said defending blue states NGs; the governors tell him to fuck himself
  • the NG commanders are faced with a choice: follow what could be very clearly construed as an illegal order by the president, or try to stick to what the spirit of their oath actually is. It’s anybody’s guess how exactly that will play out. Nonetheless, I’m certain some state NGs will echo their governor’s sentiment
  • open, armed conflict between US States

So yeah. That’s super fun to think about. Wcgw.

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago

Remember all the riots in Portland? All it would take is one side to open up with an AR and it's on.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 hours ago

And the rat fucker Rittenhouse is out there with I’m sure plenty more guns.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago

Not really a fair comparison since the average MAGA militiaman is larger than the U.S. Army.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 18 hours ago
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 20 hours ago

Queue the violence in three… two…

I plan to be as offline as possible from the election until we have a sworn president. And flee the country if the wrong one is sworn.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago

Better get in line now

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 7 points 20 hours ago

The ones who keep passing out at his own rallies? Pfft, come at me

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
219 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3813 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS