Nah this ain’t true. Under political accomplishments it should include “amazing Russian asset”

Qualifications considered by those funding her campaign:

For political accomplishments, she did managed to get invited to meeting with putin. You can't be just anybody. You have to give it to her.

As for the qualifications, trump showed us that you can do it at your own leisure, nobody will fire you if you won't do it.

She's has experience going to Russia.

Can we just say that, going forward, if you're over 70, we don't want you in ANY high pressure leadership role.

Your career is over. Shuffle the fuck off.

This thread mostly shows how broken the democratic system in the US is, not that she did anything wrong. Try coming to a real democracy with many parties and coalitions being formed. They actually thrive on dissent, finding compromise and collaborating for the greater good ;)

Being President of the US is absolutely not the hardest job in the world if clowns like Trump and Bush could do it.

Twisted mediocre bitch achieved everything she set out to do in 2016.
She must be very smug and proud of herself.

If the US had a single transferable vote system then you could comfortably vote for a third party, if you wanted to, without helping out the opponent you dislike the most.

You just rank the candidates, so you could rank Jill Stein as 1 if you want, then Harris as 2, and Trump below that. So then if Stein has fewer votes than Harris and Trump each have (likely) then her votes would transfer to whoever her voters ranked 2nd.

Under this system, a third party candidate is more likely to win (maybe you don't like Jill Stein, but conceivably a third party could produce a good candidate). The ballot under this system looks like this:

Lists of accomplishments?

Being only relevant a few months during election season.

Don't forget an endorsement from David Duke.

She's also a Russian asset and a vaccine denier.

Greens have been a joke since Nader and even then....